s perspective, there is a question over the influence of contingency theory and whether it is effective in every organizational structure and strategy that is used. Motivational Techniques of Contingency Theory Another concept which is associated with contingency theory is the motivational techniques that are defined by situational basis within an organization. A study which investigates this theory (Ozcelik, Ferman, 2006) is based on understanding whether motivational techniques change the level of competency within employees. To investigate this, a Turkish, international firm is investigated with the motivation that is used in the structure as well as whether the levels of competency change with the level of contingency theory used. The study found that the motivation and techniques changed and were heightened. However, the study also noted that this was dependent on the situation in which the level of competency sometimes remained ineffective (Ozcelik, Ferman, 2006). The contradictory statement in this particular study shows that contingency theory may work in some given environments and situations; however, it is limited and sometimes doesn’t apply. This study also is limited because it only investigates one international firm without considering the motivational factors which may change according to the company and the associations which are a part of the techniques which are used. This implies that the success rate of contingency theory may not be successful in all situations. Other Leadership Perspectives In light of the limitations of contingency theory for leadership are also other forms of leadership which are associated with the responses that are in a given environment. A specific approach which is taken is transformational leadership, which is based on...
According to a recent study, contingency theory is one which is able to offer a competitive approach to those that are in the environment. This is based on the study of a strategy structure performance and resource based view. From this particular study it was found that the organizational structure and strategy is what makes the difference, whereas the leadership skills simply support and create the competitive advantage which follows.
Contingency theory is limited in the perspectives of ideologies of motivation, how this relates to structure, environment and the individual perspectives and responses. Other forms of leadership; however, are able to show these alternatives.
The ability to understand leadership is essential to the success of a business, specifically because it develops and offers new forms and perspectives of being a leader. The concept of contingency leadership is one which is designed as a way to motivate and assist individuals according to the situation and the organization. However, this particular type of leadership is limited by the proposal of the theory, specifically because it doesn’t consider the organizational strategy, surrounding environment or the individual and member responses which may arise. This is not only seen by limitations that are noted in the studies, but is also indicated by other theories, such as transformational leadership, which show better results in terms of motivation, individual needs and leadership skills. These different concepts all show that contingency leadership is limited in the theory and practical approaches to ensuring transformation within a given environment.