Campaigns is all about branding and appealing to the electorates as the best candidate. Those vying for any position must always develop a winning strategy to attract voters to their side. Campaign strategies are based on what people value and what affects the people. …
Campaign strategies are based on what people value and what affects the people. Politicians must always preach practical ideas, things that can be implemented, not ideas that are out of reach. That is where campaign strategies come in. Speaking of campaign strategies, the just concluded United States of America election was based on issues, ideas and issues that give solutions to problems that are very close to the heart of the Americans. United States of America as the most powerful country in the world would never endorse strategies that will drag them behind, strategies that do not consider gender, age, social status, race and any other issue that affect America both within and abroad. President Obama re-election bid was about how United States of America can move forward, and was strategically planned to appeal to the electorates (Americans) as the best strategy for America. President Obama re-election bid was all about issues that affect the poor and the rich, young and old, blacks and whites, educated and non-educated, gay marriage and straight marriage. Unlike President Obama, his main challenger Mitt Romney’s campaign was majorly based on Obama’s failures, what the president promised and never accomplished. Romney’s ideas were viewed as not to be “touching” the hearts of Americans. Romney was more of what will be done if he is elected and not how they will be done if elected, unlike president Obama who preach practical ideas and how they will be done. ...
President Obama scored 50.5% (61,907,639) while Mitt Romney scooped 49.5% (58,648,640) of the popular votes. President Obama won the election despite the state of the economy because Mitt Romney never addressed issues that have close impact to the live of Americans. Mitt Romney’s stand on legalization of marijuana, same sex marriage, immigration reforms, corporate affairs and dealing with Middle East and China did not correspond well with the Americans views. Unlike Romney, President Obama was able to consolidate the sentiments of emerging voters like legalizing same sex marriage, increase social spending, legalizing the use of marijuana, reforming immigration law and withdrawal of United States of America Military from Afghanistan and Iraq. This gave President Obama an upper hand to wins votes from Hispanics, Black Americans, Millennial and Asians that boosted his victory. Furthermore, President Obama won the election because he was able to appeal to two very important constituencies namely; Millennial and Hispanics. These two groups played a very critical role in President Obama’s re-election bid. President Obama’s stand not to deport young illegals should they come to United States of America as a child and has reached the required criteria avoided any bad impact on the state of the economy. Unlike Obama, Mitt Romney view on illegals did not go well with the group thus earning President Obama their votes. According to CNN, the millennial generation, which constitutes of 19% of the total US population up from 17% in the year 2008, 60% - 36% of the millennial generation voted for president Obama. President Obama’s position on gay marriage and immigration reforms ...
Cite this document
(“Why Obama won Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/marketing/13248-why-obama-won
(Why Obama Won Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
“Why Obama Won Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/marketing/13248-why-obama-won.
President Obama Instructor’s name Customer’s name Introduction: Every now and again, there are times when events redefine history and set precedents that generations follow. The idea of a black man leading the charge of the most powerful country in the world would have been ridiculed and ignored not so long ago; however the emergence of Barack Obama has transformed realities and created an incomparable precedent for the world to follow.
(See Appendix I – “Even the Youngest Want to Take Hitler’s Picture” – First Image on page 7; Appendix II – “Jobs” – Second Image on page 9) “Total” in the context of propaganda is pertaining to the use of medium when sending out the leader’s messages across a group of audiences which aims to capture and win the support of people5.
The book has talked in detail pertaining the election and analysis of the outcome. The book has analysed debatable roles of individuals or groups in the election, the costs of the election process. It has also gone and extra mile in analyzing the role of media in the elective season.
Barack Hussein Obama came from virtually nowhere to win Democratic nomination and then pushed his opponent down the stage as he claimed his place as the President-elect of USA.
But why was Obama elected as president It is fair to say that he is young, intelligent, and ambitious with proven track record of good community sense but does this really explain why he was elected Obama is an African American; so how did the whole nation suddenly shrug off its prejudices and elect this person for the most coveted post in the world.
Finally, the introduction section gives the thesis statement of the paper, which goes like 'Barack Hussein Obama made significant contributions before becoming the US President.' The main body is divided into smaller sub titles in order to cover the topic easily and exhaustively.
Given the track record of the 2000 election that saw the election being decided in the Supreme court led some commentators to wonder,” whose election is this anyway” (Wayne, 2007). Drawing from the experiences of Al Gore and John Kerry in the previous elections, the Obama team made sure that they did not repeat the mistakes of the democratic predecessors.
Obama’s repeated assertion that “Change will come to Washington” echoed with the expectations of the electorate. This has been interpreted by many as an indication of intent to reform the governmental structure and the body polity.
The other notable feature