Its inception was in the form of a GIE, or more popularly as the Economic Interest Group. This was an attempt on the part of the European nations to unsettle the unflinching dominance of the Americans in this sector. Early phase and development of the Company The name Airbus was taken from a generic term used by the Airline industry. One of the other reasons of choosing the name was the linguistic acceptance of the name to the French. Initially, the stake holdership of the company was distributed between a number of players. Aerospatiale had 36.5% of the controlling stake in the company, whereas Deutsche Airbus also had a 36.5% share in the company. This pattern was evident in the company due to the multifarious origin. The other stakeholders were Hawker Siddeley with 20% and Fokker-VFW with 7%. A major change came in the year 1979 when the British Aerospace acquired 20% stake in the company Initiation into Aircraft Development The A-300 was the first Commercial Airline to come out of its stable. The work of the development of each of parts was given to separate countries (that in turn is routed to the various companies in the consortium). Initially the sales of the aircrafts were extremely slow, but later the sales of the aircrafts picked up considerably. This was mainly due to the development of subsequent superior models of Aircrafts as well as the innovative marketing strategies used by the company Strategic Drift- Corporate Restructuring and other changes The fact the Airbus was a consortium a number of companies was working against it. The group companies were not ready to divulge information on the technical breakthroughs. The attempt of the part of the companies to maximize the prices on the transfer of the sub assembled parts had detrimental effects on the financial fortunes of the company. Secondly, the Company was in a stage where it was developing a large number of new aircrafts to fend away competition from the other players as well as to augment market share. In the early half of 1990, a lot of steps were taken on an executive level to merge the various entities of the various companies to ensure a smoother environment for the purpose of decision making (Matthew, 1997). However, the steps were averted because of the fear of absolute ownership by one company. One such instance happened in the year 1998, when Aerospatiale tried to sabotage negotiations fearing a take over by British Aerospace and DASA. In the year 2000, three of the participating partner companies, namely CASA, Aerospatiale, Marta and Daimler Chrysler Aerospace merged together to form the new entity called as EADS. BAE and EADS transferred the production facilities to the new company called as Airbus SAS, in lieu of shareholding rights in that concern, this also brought to an end the constant bickering among the various partners and went a long way in streamlining the production facility of the consortium. Scientific implications (merging of the separate entities) The merging of the separate entities had a great effect on the operational and financial
Airbus Case Study [Type the author name] Table of Contents Background and history 4 Early phase and development of the Company 4 Initiation into Aircraft Development 4 Strategic Drift- Corporate Restructuring and other changes 5 Scientific implications (merging of the separate entities) 6 Financial Implications 6 Operations Strategy 7 Manufacturing Process Design 9 PRE PRODUCTION AND DESIGN PHASE 9 DESIGN AND PRODUCTION PHASE 10 Airbus (Quest for quality) 12 CLASSIC CASE OF A-380 12 CONCLUSION 13 REFERENCES 14 ANNEXURE 15 Annexure-1 15 Annexure-2 17 Background and history The following case study tends to comprehend the various factors that have contributed to the current exalted status of Ai…
This research aims to evaluate and present operations management of Airbus Company. The report will cover the following: issues that require investigation; objectives that would assist in evaluation of recommendations; operation management techniques; lessons learned from part three analysis; future analysis prospects.
Both Boeing and Airbus are being supported by the government of their respective countries and the financial aid given by the government has a major role to play in making sure that these firms are able to meet the demands of the stakeholders. The case reveals how the Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner stage was set up and how things were before the Boeing introduced Dreamliner in the market.
Through these cultural models, the diversity as well as the cultural difference related issues witnessed by the company in relation to its employees and the operational activities has been analyzed comprehensively. In the section of main findings, this paper also depicts major reason underlying behind the failure of European Aeronautic Defence and Space (EADS) and the British Aircraft Marconi Electronic (BAE) system.
The number of the crewmembers was 6. The plane developed a serious error on the side stick, which could not display the exact angle the plane was taking. The plane had developed serious attitude problems and the back angle increased gradually despite efforts by the crewmembers to control it.
These aircraft consist primarily of 110 seaters and larger. Airbus vies for the same market but focuses on the 'hub and spoke' method. This paper focuses on both Boeing and Airbus and their strategies for future growth. It is assumed that the reader knows the difference between 'point to point' and 'hub and spoke' air travel.
This report relies on a series of news report from The Economist, and the content of these reports are briefly summarized below as follows: EADS is the parent company of Airbus and was a contractual arrangement between France and Germany which was geared towards providing a strong rival for the American aircraft company, Boeing.
The overall case study demonstrates the trade dispute between the two manufacturers.
The key problem that needs to be solved and the overall case upon which it has been based is related to the merger between the Boeing and the McDonnell Douglas. Another problem that has
From the paper, it can be stated that the key reason for the failure of Airbus A380 project indicated towards managerial faults along with lack of proper production plans. Due to the project failure, the organisation had to face the challenges of negative publicity, financial loss and loss of key clients.
13 pages (3250 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com