Companys Organizational Architecture - Bayer Company - Essay Example

Describing a companys organizational architecture (Bayer Company) In one sense, an organization’s architecture describes the environment of an organization’s location. On the other, architecture of an organization laterally refers to the metaphorical architecture that fleshes out an organization. Organization architecture otherwise known as organizational design or organizational space is a description of the methods of creating roles, formal reporting relationships, and processes in an organization (Williams, 2012:47). Additionally, organization architecture describes the influence created by the spatial environment on people in and around the organization. Bayer Company is a worldwide enterprise, which has foundational competences and core influence in the fields of high tech materials, agriculture, and health care (Ali, 2009:62). Being an inventor firm, Bayer sets trends in areas that require intensive research (Tupper, 2011:55). It designs its products to benefit people as well as improve their quality of life. This paper will seek to Bayer Company organizational architecture. It will assess the current architecture and ratify it if appropriate or recommend for another if not suitable. Organizational architecture talks about the spatial surroundings on the mind, behavior, and health of the people in and around an organization. This is an area dominated by the perspective of inter-discipline as it draws it conclusions from architecture, organization, management in addition to knowledge obtained from spatial science, social medicine, and environmental psychology (Williams, 2011:63). Success of an organizational architecture depends on or is attributable to the quality of management practices while operating or the skills employed when designing the organization’s system. Characteristics of a successful system include its simplicity, acceptability, reliability, flexibility, and economy. The Bayer Group of companies aims at creating value through high earning power, growth, and innovation (Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, & Proper, 2010: 33). The architectural design of Bayer Company indicates that it is flexible as every three subgroups operate independently. The other three service companies also function independently led by the holding company in management. This shows that Bayer Company values the aspect of common goals, values, and strategies making it flexible (Ali, 2009:83). An effective organization design does not need to be complicated. On contrary, organization design finds simplicity a highly desirable quality. Pertinently, think about the task of passing information regarding the allocation of the organization’s inputs and operation of a scheme (Varma, 2009:72). Agreeably, the task is not easy if the components are less and the relationship shared between and among the systems, users, and inputs allocation is straightforward. Nevertheless, when an organization’s system of communicating information and allocating inputs becomes complex, problems begin to multiply (Jennings, 2006:58). Particularly, the best form of ensuring simplicity in organization is by using precise definitions and outlining the specific function of every subsystem. With reference to Bayer Company, the organizational architecture is simple. For instance, if a customer requires medical care, he or she visits the pharmaceutical division located on its own site (Leverkusen, Germany). Location plays a major role in ensuring simplicity of an organization (Tupper, 2011:79). Having different divisions servicing different customer needs reduces issues related to complexity. As observed, Bayer organizational architecture is flexible. As such, change in conditions does not pose any threats since managers are able and always prepared to adjust or shift operations accordingly in case of any conditional change (Saha, 2007:54). Research findings maintain that systems reliability is a crucial aspect of organizational architecture. At Bayer Company, systems reliability is high given that maintenance of consistency in the workplace is frequent (Williams, 2011:91). Through intensified check ups, Bayer Company’s operations work effectively as members of the staff network in all divisions in ensure reliability. Services offered by Bayer ever changing. The company believes in the power of invention and innovation. It has the ability to bring into the market different products every now and then since the company embraces the facet of meeting their client’s needs. This entails that its organization design is reliable and customers, stakeholders, employees, and others can hold Bayer Company dependable in all its dealings (Williams, 2012:88). Economy is an imperative strategy of organizational architecture. Looking at Bayer’s organizational space, it is explicitly economical. Fact-findings based on organizational architecture reveals that an affective system of an organization should not be necessarily economical or efficient (Tupper, 2011:96). This is so because take, for instance, the postal service. In order for the postal service to keep up with its schedule, it must hire a large number of employees to cater for the large delivery of mails. In this case, an organization’s efficiency may reduce (Ali, 2009:119). It is redundant and expensive to develop only a segment of an organization’s scheme and leave the other partially attended or unattended (Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, & Proper, 2010: 61). What happens at Bayer Company is that, the management team maintains a balanced supply of materials in all its divisions, which helps increase efficiency and sustains the economy of the company’s operations. Since Bayer keeps the art of improving people’s quality of life at heart, it focuses on acceptable business services. In addition, for it to maintain a competitive front in the market, this company appears proactive in ensuring acceptability of its dealings (Varma, 2009:101). It also keeps a solid base for corporate responsibility in which it takes part in communal development programs. It is through its social corporate responsibility that Bayer Company resolute to ensure that people find its activities environmental friendly and human considerate. Its involvement in the health and innovative sector makes it value the aspect of greater living standards for humans hence designs roles, creates processes, and formulates improved means of reporting aimed (Jennings, 2006:85). This is all possible since Bayer Company’s organizational architecture is acceptable and in essence, its building structure displays a high level of architectural expertise. Moreover, Bayer’s organizational architecture is elaborate. Profoundly, the organizational design of Bayer Company has a considerable system and divides its operations into reasonable tasks (Richmond, Turton, & Stevenson, 2002:49). In conclusion, the Bayer Company’s organizational architecture or rather space is appropriate but requires a bit of upgrading. Generally, the way this company operates is substantial given the results obtained are almost cognitive every time. Via innovation, Bayer has come to emerge as the global leader in provision of medical and healthcare products (Tupper, 2011:112). Its organizational is appropriate since it allowed the Bayer AG to intensify its scientific research programs and feature in social media as the world’s renowned innovator of scientific study. Nonetheless, improving its organizational design could lead to more research and improved provision of services (Richmond, Turton, & Stevenson, 2002:90). It is recommendable that Bayer incorporates the use of up-to-date technological methods of researching in order to cater for patients seeking medical help from endangered diseases such as cancer and HIV/AIDS. Although known as the leading provider of medicinal drugs, it is still lagging behind that is the reason it has not invented any drug that can cure diseases like AIDS (Ali, 2009:136). Thus, this finds it pragmatic to recommend further research by Bayer Company in order to substantiate its organizational architecture by finding medicinal drugs capable of curing such diseases. Bibliography Ali, B. M. 2009. Software architecture knowledge management: theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer. International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, & Overhage, S. 2007. Software architectures, components and applications: third International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA 2007, Medford, MA, USA, July 11-13, 2007 : revised selected papers. Berlin: Springer. Jennings, M. 2006. Business: its legal, ethical, and global environment. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/West. Richmond, L., Turton, A., & Stevenson, J. 2002. The pharmaceutical industry: a guide to historical records. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Saha, P. 2007. Handbook of enterprise systems architecture in practice. Hershey: PA, Information Science. Tupper, C. D. 2011. Data architecture: from zen to reality. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier. Varma, V. 2009. Software architecture a case based approach. Patparganj, Delhi: Dorling Kindersley. Williams, C. 2011. Management. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Williams, C. 2012. Effective management: a multimedia approach. Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage Learning. Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, & Proper, E. 2010. Trends in enterprise architecture research: 5th International Workshop, TEAR 2010, Delft, the Netherlands, November 12, 2010 : proceedings. Berln: Springer Verlag. Read More