Some of these reasons are clearly envisioned in the case study on Genting International and includes the fact that transnational ownership give owners of companies the right and opportunity of benefiting from labor and investment laws that apply to both national companies and international companies. In the case of Genting International, because the company was based in Singapore, it had every right to participate in the bid if the bid had been opened to Singaporean companies alone. At the same time, the company was in position to undertake a foreign market entry as an international company. The reason that has made this situation possible in most cases is that the different owners who come from different countries have always registered parts of the company in their respective countries (Savior, 2009). When a bid for international companies arise therefore, it is the owner with registration in a different country who participants in the bid so as to create a foreign market entry. Advantages of the present Foreign Market Entry For Genting International and Las Vegas Sands who have own the two places available in the bid, there are several advantages that they are going to reap as foreign companies who have made investments in Singapore. The first of such benefits has to do with the fact that these companies are fortunate to be coming from an industry that could be described as relatively new in Singapore because of the ban on the operations of casinos that had been on the hospitality industry for a long time. Indeed, now that these companies are coming in with such a vast amount of investment, they are going to great a pioneering brand that would forever become a legacy in the casino industry in that country. If well monitored, this is going to be a major competitive advantage for future entrants into that sector of the economy. The reason for this assertion is that by the time new companies come in, these two companies might have had their names settling well with customers. They might have also created a very formidable organizational culture would be too familiar with their customer for the customers to change them. Without any doubt, tax moratorium that the two companies have ten years to benefit from because they are foreign companies is not something that can be overlooked as an important merit at all. In a recent research, it was discovered that 12% of companies that were liquidated in the United Kingdom from the year 1992 to 2002 suffered that fate because of their inability to grow beyond 2% a year (Gardener, 2007). Further investigations proofed that whereas these companies could not record 2% of growth over their total revenues, they were paying over 7% of taxes over their total revenues. In congruence, it could be said that these companies collapsed because of huge tax demands. This is certainly a situation that for the next ten years, the winning bidders are going to be exempted from. Clearly, the amounts of money that should have gone into the payment of taxes for all these ten years can be channeled to other sectors of growth, expansion and development. If for nothing at all, the companies can be investing these amounts in long term financial investment policies so that when they start paying taxes, they would not suffer any shocks in terms of decline of revenue. Challenges associated with the present Foreign Market Entry Genting International and
Ownership in Foreign Direct Investment Type of Ownership One significant feature that is seen about the type of ownership that prevails in Genting International’s situation is that even though the mother company could be generally described as a foreign company, the delivery company, which is Genting International itself, is based in Singapore…
Armed with a financial budget of approximately $500m, the company should consider whether it will pursue Foreign Direct Investments in South Africa and Vietnam, because of the prevailing GEAR strategy in the former, as well as the one party political climate, as well as the population of the market segment be targeted in the latter.
FDI can also be defined as an investment of a company in a foreign country by building a factory within the host country. It is through a company’s direct investment in machinery, building and equipment in another country that foreign direct investment is made possible.
Eventually, countries will continue to entice high level of investment coming specifically from foreign enterprises. It is believed that trans-national firms will consider this as potentially beneficial for their operations.
Globalisation is also considered as a primary contributor to the methods used to develop foreign direct investments.
Of all the member countries of Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation - APEC it's only the US that holds a larger potion of the inward FDI stock. China's FDI is mainly comprised of Greenfield investments as opposed to the US inward FDI that is basically the takeover of existing enterprises rather than creation of new enterprises.
Some of these countries became full European Union (EU) members in May 2004. They also experienced a significant increase in foreign direct investment (FDI). As a consequence, the ratio of inward FDI stock to the 12 CEE countries studied here in total world inward FDI stock increased more than three-fold, from 0.81% in 1994 to 2.89% in 2004.
Indirect effects take place through movement of trained labor from foreign firms to other sectors as well as through the increase of employment in domestic subcontractors. Moreover, the integration of foreign direct investment (FDI) into a local economy results often in a deep social change.
In 2005 the price rose by 72%. Australia benefits the most since it is the world's biggest exporter of iron ore. The output from Rio Tinto's mines in the Pilbara, in north-west Australia, has increased by an average of 15% a year since 1999. Between now and 2013 it plans to triple its output.
China is now the largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the developing world. According to Wang et al., (2002), recent years have witnessed the emergence of China as one of the most important destinations for foreign direct investment (FDI), with the country receiving about US$403.98 billion by the end of 1999.
ere are four defining features of FDI; transfer of capital, control of investment, source of funds for foreign operations and flow of balance of payments (Breifeld 1). Grimwade (125) lists three types of FDI; horizontal, where a firm locates the manufacture of the same product
Foreign direct investment takes place when organizations in a nation purchase ownership of assets, in other nations. This purchase of assets occurs in a manner that allows the foreign company or individual to take charge of the means of production, distribution and other activities associated with goods and services in the foreign nation.
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Ownership in Foreign Direct Investment for FREE!