The aim of this project is to examine Nike's branding strategy in order to identify the structure, challenges and recommendations for potential improvement. In order to attain this end, the following objectives will be explored: 1. A critical analysis of the strategy for success used by Nike over the past two decades. 2. An examination of the current challenges of the company. 3. Recommendations for the improvement of Nike's existing branding strategy 4. An identification of the branding model used by Nike which can be applicable to other companies. The report will involve a critique of the branding systems and strategies that Nike has used to attain results in its operations. It will analyse the dominant patterns and trends that are used by the company and the main approach which has resulted in the successes of Nike as a major global sports brand. The report will entail a review of the methods and approaches used by the company. The fundamental approach will be through a review of relevant literature. The review will cover the various internal dealings of the Nike and how it has paid off in the area of branding. 2.0 Literature Review This section will examine the important elements and components of the research and study. The section will critically evaluate different groundbreaking definitions and ideas that form the basic framework of the study. They will serve to define the core aspects and of the study and provide an understanding that will create the foundation for the fieldwork and actual research that will be conducted in this study. 2.1 Brand The question of what a “brand” is plays a significant role in this whole study. This is because the research provides a discussion brand-related matters in Nike, hence it is important to understand the concept of brand and its role in organisations' operations and activities. Kotler defines a brand as “a name, term, sign, symbol or design or a combination of this intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of competitors” (Knoweles et al, 2010, p91). This implies that a brand is a unique identity or a unique representation that defines a given company's product or offering. This makes the company's offering different from what other companies in the industry are presenting to companies in the industry. To this end, Nike's offering is the popular symbol which makes it different from other competitors like Adidas and Puma who have very different symbols. The idea is to get a unique representation that is protected by law which sets each of the sports manufacturers apart from the other manufacturers. A brand creates and identification for the products in a given entity and builds an emotional connection that acts as basis on which communication with consumers can proceed (Schultz, 2009). This implies that the brand creates a basic and simple representation that other consumers can easily build some kind of connection to. The fundamental position of branding is to provide a means through which easy communication can be conducted. In other words, a brand creates an all-encompassing image which the consumers can identify with through minimal efforts. Once a brand is created, various concepts and ideas of the product offerings are woven into the brand and advertising and other marketing communication ventures are
Company Case Analysis Project An Enquiry into Branding at Nike 1.0 Introduction Branding is an important aspect of marketing (Ashworth and Kavaratzis, 2010). It is a central theme in the development of the marketing plan which lies at the heart of corporate strategy (Kumar, 2009)…
Considering the media industry in the United Kingdom, it has been learnt that the industry has huge opportunities in the fields of computer graphics, computer games, creation of films, interactive media, radio and television. More and more skills are being recognized in these areas and multiple platforms are providing support for the television programs.
This paper provides an analysis of Sonoco Product Company: Building a World-Class Human Resource Organization. In this analysis, the challenges that face Sonoco Products Company to restructure its corporate strategy (for example, Human Resource, structure and products) are outlined.
In addition, relevant provisions in respect of allotment of shares have to be scrutinised. The Companies Act 2006, under section 171, requires directors to act as per the provisions of the constitution of their company. Moreover, directors have to exercise their powers only for the purposes for which these powers had been conferred on them.
Global Hardwood Company (GHC) is an international company that operates in more than one country. The company began as a single-family business but it expanded and became a public limited establishment. The GHC is headquartered in an attractive marketplace within the town of the English Midlands.
Many firms enter foreign markets in order to diversify geographically, to obtain raw materials for their industries, to follow overseas customers, to bypass protectionist regulations, to protect their local market as well as to attack the competitor’s market thus forcing the competitor to utilize more resources at home.
gums, and through its acquisition of other branded companies, manufactures and distributes well-known international brands including Trident and Halls Vapor Drops.
The sales of the company’s chocolate products make up a whopping 80 percent of the entire company revenues in
Duty not to benefit from third parties: Any benefits obtained in this way will have to be accounted for to the company even if the company benefits as well. All directors who face actual or possible conﬂicts of interest by virtue of their position must either obtain authority to act, or remove the possibility of the conﬂict, or resign as directors.
t highlights the problems it faced as a result of its traditional organizational culture and what the management had to do to overcome these setbacks. Boeing faced stiff competition from rival companies, had a near bureaucratic leadership therefore criticised for not adapting to
A current ratio of 2.00 is recommended since it shows the firms ease in meeting its short-term obligations. This shows that Gillette falls short of this level and hence inefficient use of its current assets and current
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com