Is Google Making the Digital Divide Worse - Essay Example
Not dowloaded yet
Extract of sample Is Google Making the Digital Divide Worse
Some sections of the population could not afford; thus, division into lines such as the Troost Avenue. Worse still, Google Fiber is making the divide worse as it continues to define the have and have not’s in the society. Even with campaigns and advertisements among the neighborhoods on Google Fiber, the community members realized that the major challenge was the cost of connection (Brick 3). It is worse than in Kansas City, there is no free or rather cheaper access to Wi-Fi like in Africa. It is not even clear whether Google has any plans to help the communities that are not able to access Fiber especially the poor households in Kansa City. One would argue that it is odd that the benefits of technology are known, but very little is done to support communities that do not have the ability to access the same (Brick 6). Though Google has offered to offer free services to different sites selected by the city, it is clear how this system will function as well as its long-term effect. Considering that different communities cannot access fiber, it is arguable that the system is not feasible. The digital divide can then be said to have profound roots that have perpetuated discrimination, differences in education and even access to capital and technology. The Google Fiber project is market-oriented and rarely helps the present community members especially the less fortunate members of the society. More commitment from Google may be instrumental in reducing the Digital Divide in the society today.
From the discussion in the essay "Is Google Making the Digital Divide Worse", it may be concluded that google fiber project is market-oriented and rarely helps the present community members. More commitment from Google may be instrumental in reducing the Digital Divide in the society today…
This divide is not because of national boundaries; instead this divide is due to a gap of technological outreach among different geographical areas, most importantly rural vs. urban areas (Curtis, 2002; NTIA, 1997). This outreach problem is because of several other reasons as well, such as difference in education level, difference in perceived needs of the societies, the person’s income and their age.
The use of ICT is an important element of efficient participation in society. Given the fundamental part that ICT plays in individual welfare, organizational growth, and national development, the government of the UK cannot afford to underestimate the significance of what was referred to as the 'Digital Divide' in 1990s.
THE DIGITAL DIVIDE EXPLAINED; THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF IMPROVING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE . Introduction According to Mossberger, Tolbert and Stansbury, today Information Technology is a vital component in the daily lives of a majority of Americans (2003).
Access to technology has been on the increase due to cheap availability and ease in use among different technology access methods. Smartphones, personal computers and other portable devices have eased and increased access to technology amongst members in the society.
This is the underlying purpose behind the concept “wisdom of crowd”. The concept refers to the process of gathering collective views of a group of individuals rather than a single expert on a specific problem. Crowdsourcing is a term that refers to the practice of gaining funding or services done by a group of people.
This paper provides an insightful study of the 'digital divide' that highlights the 'information poverty' existing in the third world countries. The study also identifies various social, economic, and political factors that establish or reinforce the discrepancies concerning availability and usage of information in different nations.
While males tend to use digital technology more readily than females, there is evidence to suggest that some races use the Internet more frequently than others. It has also been discerned that while males and females tend to use digital technology for different purposes, the races also utilize the Internet for a variety of disparate reasons.
Information equity has always been important for agencies and public policies, and the concept of information equity revolves around the digital divide. Digital divide was widespread at the advent of information technology, but now, if not at homes, then at
The Global Technology Report 2012 constructed a variable called “digitization” based on key attributes: ubiquity or universality of access to digital services, affordability of digital services, reliability, speed, usability of digital services, and “skill of