Over the long course of the Middle Ages, there emerged a fundamental struggle between faith and reason. As Christianity became influential and institutional, the notion of faith began to oppose the predominate Greek philosophy of reason. This conflict would emerge to shape Western culture and give rise to the notion that the two were incompatible…
I agree with him wholeheartedly.
As with many disputes between polar opposites, the truth of the matter often lies between the extremes. As modern people studying the Middle Ages, it is easy to understand this concept and appreciate the articulation of it by Frederick Artz (1954) who states that "it may be seen [that] the faith of the Middle Ages [is] seeking reason, just as in the twentieth century, men, grown weary of reason, are seeking faith" (p. 253). The balance and cooperation of the two yields a much more constructive world view. From that perspective, the question of why reason has been seen as the enemy of faith-and how that perception came to be so pervasive-surfaces. For Stark and others, the partial answer lies in widely-adopted historical misperceptions regarding some of the greatest examples of the conflict.
Misinformation is one of the primary enemies for Stark. For example, one of the most obvious conflicts noted today is the one that occurred in Christopher Columbus' day regarding the question of the shape of the world. The traditional teaching is that the Church of that time insisted that the world was flat, while science clearly demonstrated it was round. Stark refutes this by stating that "[a]ll educated persons of Columbus' day, very much including the Roman Catholic prelates, knew the earth was round" (2003, p. 27). The myth, for Stark, that science is opposed to faith is largely predicated upon erroneous historical "fact." In the modern attempt to discredit the teachings of the Church, critics of faith have been so interested in making their point that they haven't gotten their facts right.
Of course, the conflict of faith and reason ranged over the entirety of the Middle Ages, a period in excess of a thousand years. Accordingly, there were ebbs and flows within the years where reason predominated over faith and then faith would philosophically dominate reason. Consider Artz's framing of the time period where he derives three distinct periods; the Platonic where reason is "subordinated" to faith, the Aristotelian where there is "alliance," and the final period where scholasticism was unable to "rationalize the dogma of the church" (1954, p. 253). It was during this final era of the Middle Ages where philosophy and reason irrevocably parted from faith. This antagonism is the legacy left to the modern day, and Stark stands opposed.
The alliance between faith and reason is not a new hypothesis, though modern-day students might think it so. Thomas Aquinas advocated this blend so effectively that Richard Regan, in the preface to his book translating the saint's work, avers that "no serious student of Western thought can be considered well-educated without acquaintance with St. Thomas's grand synthesis of faith and reason" (Aquinas, 1997, p. ix). Hence, the use of reason to deepen faith is at once ancient and contemporary. It is also appropriate; and I agree with it.
Neither faith nor reason exists in a vacuum. Proponents of each discipline should consider the worth of the other. For me, reason or science is not a threat to my faith. While I may not be able to always reconcile my beliefs with my observations, neither am I compelled to ...
Cite this document
(“Rodney Stark: Faith and Reason Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/272118-rodney-stark-faith-and-reason
(Rodney Stark: Faith and Reason Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Rodney Stark: Faith and Reason Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/272118-rodney-stark-faith-and-reason.
Specifically, Greek antiquity, the Christian tradition, Renaissance and Enlightenment thought, Hegel and Descartes, Existentialism and Pragmatism are considered. The research argues that while much of the rationality and conclusions reached in these historical investigations have since been discarded by contemporary thinkers one recognizes that in many instances faith-based investigation into god and reasoning have been aligned with each, as well as with traditional academics concerns, such as politics and culture.
On the other hand, reason as the name implies, is the justification that is put forth to explain a belief, phenomenon or conception. Reason is normally made up of scientific discoveries of facts or else, it may also be the outcome of an individual’s personal opinion.
There is a significant relationship between faith and reason in St. Augustine’s Confessions. In book 1, St. Augustine states “...and in Thee live the eternal reasons of all things unreasoning and temporal”1. The verse shows that Saint Augustine God allows everything that happens on a person, community or country.
In order to explore the real meaning and nature of logos, this study aims to compare and contrast the competing philosophical and theological point-of-view of Boyarin (2001) and Hillar (1998). To give the readers a better understanding with regards to the different philosophical and theological views with regards to the nature of logos, this study will first discuss the conclusion that each author aims to establish followed by discussing the arguments made by each author.
But that was four centuries ago, and those four centuries have seen science and faith grow further and further apart. The examples are legion: multiple world wars aided and abetted by new destructive technologies made possible by science, the nuclear arms race, environmental degradation on a planetary scale, a growing divide between the have most and have nots, the multitude of scientific discoveries that show that the universe is far less ordered from on high than Bacon would ever have believed – evolution, relativity, dark matter, dark energy, quantum physics, quantum gravity, punctuated equilibrium, quarks, and more.
Hope is the context or medium of faith, what renders faith viable, because without hope, what faith opens itself to would be either prosaic or meaningless, ordinary or irrelevant. The synonyms of faith are 'belief and trust'.
Faith is usually connected with religious practices and actions.
Faith transcends reason. Reason gets stuck up at the last hurdle and knocks desperately at the portals of faith. But the doors of faith will never open, so far as an individual sticks to reason. When logic surrenders, the true nature of faith
Reason is normally made up of scientific discoveries of facts or else, it may also be the outcome of an individual’s personal opinion. Reasoning is the name of explanation with justification. Justification in turn is drawn from universally acknowledged facts and
As the society evolved, so did the religion. So, the primitive faith in the metaphysical explanation of the natural phenomena was substituted by a more sophisticated spiritual framework which can be exemplified
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Rodney Stark: Faith and Reason for FREE!