Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

LAW (sheapard v. united states) - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : ferne44

Summary

Major Charles A Shepard of the United States Army was convicted of murdering his wife Zenana Shepard at Fort Riley Kansas. Shepard was accused of murdering his wife by poisoning her with Bichloride of Mercury. The motive seemed to be that Major Shepard was in love with another woman and wanted to make to be with this woman…

Extract of sample
LAW (sheapard v. united states)


In 1933 Major Shepard files a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. A Writ of Certiorari is a document in which the losing party files with the Supreme Court asking them to review the case from a lower court (Techlaw Journal, 2008). This can be done when the petitioner is dissatisfied with the decisions of the lower courts including the US Court of Appeals. A Writ can be granted at the discretion of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court being the highest Court in the Nation has the right to not accept the petition and there has to be some kind of compelling reason for acceptance. In Shepards Case the Writ of Certiorari was granted.
US Supreme Court Judge Cardozo reveals to the court that circumstantial evidence was used to prove to the jury the Major Shepard was guilty. According to the judge a conversation with Mrs. Shepards nurse Clara Brown, Mrs. Shepard asked the nurse to find her a bottle of whiskey. She then asked the nurse if there was enough left to prove the existence of poison. The nurse then states that the Mrs. Shepard accuses her husband of poisoning her.
The Judge then states "The admission of this declaration, if erroneous, was more than unsubstantial error. As to that the parties are agreed. The voice of the dead wife was heard in accusation of her husband, and the accusation was accepted as evidence of guilt. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Employment Law--Case Report [British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue]
In some countries (such as Canada), employment laws related to unionised workplaces are differentiated from those relating to particular individuals. In most countries however, no such distinction is made. The labour movement has been instrumental in the enacting of laws protecting labour rights in the 19th and 20th centuries." 1…
10 pages (2510 words)
The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski
The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.…
2 pages (502 words)
The United States Supreme Court
In this analysis, this is a strong majority opinion and probably not subject to change in the future. Sections 506(a) and 506(d) deal with independent legal issues, the language of 506(a) may not be used to invoke the lien avoiding language of 506(d), and debtors must suffer the burden of such disparities between the value of the underlying collateral and the debt itself. The Court’s holding, it must be noted, was not unanimous. Two Justices, Scalia and Souter, dissented. The dissenting opinion argued that sections 506(a) and 506(d) ought to have been read as complementary sections, that…
2 pages (502 words)
Nixon v United States
doubts the people of America had regarding “The efficiency of a system that not only comprises of the President and the White House staff, but also extends to the office of independent counsel-its authority and its jurisdiction.” (Frederick M. Kaiser, p 5). The tapes, one of them called ‘The Smoking Gun’ which include the recorded conversations, that revealed Nixon’s alleged acts that were antagonistic to justice and highlighted his attempts to cover up the attempted break-in, led to a lot of public disgust for the Republican Party. Keeping in mind the disastrous effect the Watergate…
2 pages (502 words)
CASE ANALYSIS "heart of atlanta motel v. united states"
In the case under consideration, Heart of Atlanta Motel questioned and challenged the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and attempted to justify and assert its policy of discrimination against African Americans.…
2 pages (502 words)
weeks v. united states
In the case of Weeks v. United States, Weeks’ property was searched by the state agents without a lawful warrant and some papers and other possessions were seized by the agents which led to the conclusion that the defendant was an illegal gambler. However, this constituted a violation of the Fourth Amendment because otherwise the evidence that was collected in this unlawful manner should not have been used in the federal criminal prosecution.…
1 pages (251 words)
UNITED STATES V. MONTGOMERY
These buys ranged from one to seven ounces of crack cocaine, which was significant under existing Texas statute. After a Grand Jury indictment, Montgomery was tried and convicted of several of the charges levied against him and sentenced to 160 months imprisonment. The appeal that was lodged was based on the following five premises: Sufficiency of evidence, Jencks Act, Evidentiary Matters, the Batson Challenge, and prosecutorial misconduct.…
1 pages (251 words)