In 1933 Major Shepard files a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. A Writ of Certiorari is a document in which the losing party files with the Supreme Court asking them to review the case from a lower court (Techlaw Journal, 2008). This can be done when the petitioner is dissatisfied with the decisions of the lower courts including the US Court of Appeals. A Writ can be granted at the discretion of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court being the highest Court in the Nation has the right to not accept the petition and there has to be some kind of compelling reason for acceptance. In Shepards Case the Writ of Certiorari was granted.
US Supreme Court Judge Cardozo reveals to the court that circumstantial evidence was used to prove to the jury the Major Shepard was guilty. According to the judge a conversation with Mrs. Shepards nurse Clara Brown, Mrs. Shepard asked the nurse to find her a bottle of whiskey. She then asked the nurse if there was enough left to prove the existence of poison. The nurse then states that the Mrs. Shepard accuses her husband of poisoning her.
The Judge then states "The admission of this declaration, if erroneous, was more than unsubstantial error. As to that the parties are agreed. The voice of the dead wife was heard in accusation of her husband, and the accusation was accepted as evidence of guilt.
Cite this document
(“LAW CASE (sheapard v. united states) Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/272986-law-case-sheapard-v-united-states
(LAW CASE (sheapard V. United States) Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“LAW CASE (sheapard V. United States) Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/272986-law-case-sheapard-v-united-states.
Cited: 0 times
Major Charles A Shepard of the United States Army was convicted of murdering his wife Zenana Shepard at Fort Riley Kansas. Shepard was accused of murdering his wife by poisoning her with Bichloride of Mercury. The motive seemed to be that Major Shepard was in love with another woman and wanted to make to be with this woman…
Facts – Alfonso Lopez, Jr., a 12th grade student at Edison High School in San Antonio, Texas, carried into the school, on March 10, 1982m a revolver with several cartridges. Having been questioned by the school personnel, he admitted to possessing a gun.
United States v. Wade
Two weeks after his arrest, Wade was placed in a line up with other similar looking men where the two employees who were present during the robbery positively identified Wade as one of the perpetrators.
The witness identification procedure was undertaken by the FBI without considering the need of the accused to have legal counsel present.
United States v. Salerno
Therefore, there was no violation of the 5th amendment nor the Excessive Bail Clause of the 8th Amendment. This case was based upon the arrest and subsequent indictment of La Cosa Nostra boss Anthony Salerno on violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act).
US were defined by the abominable policy of segregation, a dubious and heinous system that validated the separation of the White and Black Americans in the public sphere. Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited any sort of discrimination in public accommodations like hotels and
The content of the case is relevant to the scope of this course. It elaborates on chapter 12 of the U.S laws on Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the guidelines followed upon declaration of one’s bankruptcy and forced to sell his or her
The Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York started investigations in January 2002. On February 4, 2002, Martha Stewart took an interview at the office of the United States Attorney and on April 10, 2002 by telephone.
In a manner of saying, this jurisprudence promulgated an exception to the exception, which deliberately pertains to the essence of the fourth amendment. This decision has created a difference of opinion, on the one hand providing for
Wong and a second petitioner, Mr. James Wah Toy, the prosecutors convinced the court of Wong Sun’s guilt of drug trafficking.
Reasoning: The process of collecting evidence and witness statements must follow a particular structure, one that upholds the basic human
According to the research findings, Ozawa argues that via immigration of Japanese to the United States where the citizens are white, the former was able to assimilate naturally the white people’s culture when they started interacting through marriage. Therefore, through marriage, the Japanese were able to become part of the whites hence they attained citizenship of being recognized as whites.
1 pages (250 words)Assignment
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic LAW CASE (sheapard v. united states) for FREE!