Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

LAW (sheapard v. united states) - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Case Study
Miscellaneous
Pages 2 (502 words)

Summary

Major Charles A Shepard of the United States Army was convicted of murdering his wife Zenana Shepard at Fort Riley Kansas. Shepard was accused of murdering his wife by poisoning her with Bichloride of Mercury. The motive seemed to be that Major Shepard was in love with another woman and wanted to make to be with this woman…

Extract of sample
LAW (sheapard v. united states)


In 1933 Major Shepard files a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. A Writ of Certiorari is a document in which the losing party files with the Supreme Court asking them to review the case from a lower court (Techlaw Journal, 2008). This can be done when the petitioner is dissatisfied with the decisions of the lower courts including the US Court of Appeals. A Writ can be granted at the discretion of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court being the highest Court in the Nation has the right to not accept the petition and there has to be some kind of compelling reason for acceptance. In Shepards Case the Writ of Certiorari was granted.
US Supreme Court Judge Cardozo reveals to the court that circumstantial evidence was used to prove to the jury the Major Shepard was guilty. According to the judge a conversation with Mrs. Shepards nurse Clara Brown, Mrs. Shepard asked the nurse to find her a bottle of whiskey. She then asked the nurse if there was enough left to prove the existence of poison. The nurse then states that the Mrs. Shepard accuses her husband of poisoning her.
The Judge then states "The admission of this declaration, if erroneous, was more than unsubstantial error. As to that the parties are agreed. The voice of the dead wife was heard in accusation of her husband, and the accusation was accepted as evidence of guilt. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Employment Law--Case Report [British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue]
In some countries (such as Canada), employment laws related to unionised workplaces are differentiated from those relating to particular individuals. In most countries however, no such distinction is made. The labour movement has been instrumental in the enacting of laws protecting labour rights in the 19th and 20th centuries." 1…
10 pages (2510 words)
The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski
The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.…
2 pages (502 words)
The United States Supreme Court
In this analysis, this is a strong majority opinion and probably not subject to change in the future. Sections 506(a) and 506(d) deal with independent legal issues, the language of 506(a) may not be used to invoke the lien avoiding language of 506(d), and debtors must suffer the burden of such disparities between the value of the underlying collateral and the debt itself. The Court’s holding, it must be noted, was not unanimous. Two Justices, Scalia and Souter, dissented. The dissenting opinion argued that sections 506(a) and 506(d) ought to have been read as complementary sections, that…
2 pages (502 words)