A teacher of mine in this program once described traditional teaching methods in which the students sat in well-ordered rows and the teacher stood and handed out papers as the "spray and pray" method. The teacher sprayed the material and prayed it stuck. If the students scored well on test, the teacher was successful…
Learner-centered learning environments are founded on the principal that learning is an active process. Learning is an interaction between the student and text, involving the activation of prior knowledge and relating new ideas to preexisting schemata. Based on this paradigm learner-centered environments engage the student both personally and intellectually and provide the best method for meeting the needs of all learners.
In teacher-centered learning environments, the more traditional and widespread approach, the teacher is viewed as the focal point and leader of learning. The teacher is the authority, leaving the students in the passive role as receivers of knowledge, rather than active constructors of that knowledge. That knowledge is finite and discrete.
In teacher-centered learning the lessons are instructionally driven, leaving the students unengaged intellectually and emotionally. These traditional methods include memorization, completing worksheets, reading a text and answering predetermined questions - demonstrating knowledge of the "right" answer. In this form of learning there is limited activation of prior knowledge, and therefore students struggle to create personally significant meaning. This is because in teacher-centered learning the background, values and interests of the learner are nonexistent. The student is passively filled in with information, rather than engaged in his own learning process. Learning environments are controlled, organized and with an emphasis on independent seatwork. Lessons, classwork and homework are results-driven. This unresponsive and static approach also fails to meet the needs of special needs populations, because lesson goals and objectives are standardized, meaning students must adapt to the methods oftentimes with some students unable to engage the teacher's attention to meet their needs.
One of the most significant challenges in teacher-centered learning is in assessment. Using traditional methods such as standardized tests rather than qualitative measures, teacher-centered learning places the emphasis on performance and repetition of facts. It leaves little room for students to construct their own meaning based on their own experiences, cultural background, values and interests. This causes a mismatch between goals and assessment. For this reason, many times students can appear to understand material in one format, yet in another appear unsuccessful during assessments because of the focus on success rather than on learning.
Characteristics of Learner-Centered Environments
In learner-centered environments the student becomes the actor in his own learning, and
therefore the teacher becomes the facilitator to that learning by designing learning
activities which actively engage the learner. This is based on the theory that all know-
ledge is organized in schemata - the underlying connections that allow new experiences
and information to be aligned with previous knowledge (Landry, 2002).
Activities: Engaging and Adaptive
As the designer of lessons rather than an authority, and with the understanding that
Students exhibit various strengths and weaknesses in learning styles and modalities, the
teacher's role is to create activities which are varied and engage these differences, rather
than repress ...
Cite this document
(“Student Learning Methods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/274730-student-learning-methods
(Student Learning Methods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Student Learning Methods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/274730-student-learning-methods.
Distributed leadership (DL) evolved as the need to improve student achievement increased, and the financial resources to accommodate more administrators decreased. Distributed leadership (DL) has been defined by many writers as shared leadership, capacity building, and transformational leadership (Leithwood and Jantzi, 2003).
Although this approach is unique and exquisite, it defies the status quo of testing that has plagued the educational system in the United States. This paper will define the key theory usage of rubric that is the focal point in the hybrid-problem based learning system that has tremendous benefits for any academic center.
Hodkinson and Macleod (2010) make a good attempt to reconsider the current body of learning research and seek to develop valid linkages between research methods and conceptualizations of learning. In other words, the goal of their research is to understand how different methods of researching learning affect the meaning of learning and its concept.
According to the report three different theories (imitation, reinforcement, and active construction of grammar) have been advanced to explain the language acquisition process. Of the three theories, the active construction of grammar theory seems to be flawless and suffices to explain the learning process.
There are several suggestions given to address this problem, such as to provide schools greater leeway in making spending decisions, school redesign, market-driven solutions, and so on. However, the author believes that the best ways to resolve the issue are to implement research- and best-practice-based strategies, reallocation of current resources, and school redesign.
Along with the use of different teaching methods is the need to construct different evaluation methods. These evaluation methods are also many and the use of one for all teaching experiences is not effective. Each learning experience may need a different rubric.
Disabled students suffer perennially. They ask "Why" every second of their life. When they are alone and when they are in public and interactive situations - they are comparing in the depths of their nerves. They are tense from within most of the time
The inclusive learner-centred system of classroom instruction is one of the most effective tools for special needs children to be able to feel adjusted into the mainstream social milieu and eventually function as a happy, independent, and productive member of society. This paper establishes best teaching practices that are applied in such a class.
Various methods of learning have come up in order to fully satisfy people‘s desire to learn, as people have different learning abilities. However, most of the methods work hand in hand to satisfy one’s desire to learn. The methods include the Lectures, Presentation,
Conventional schooling applied and still maintains mostly used logical and linguistic teaching it further applied limited mix of teaching and learning techniques. Many learning institutions still depend on book based and classroom, pressured
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Student Learning Methods for FREE!