StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Why Did Romans Fear Rule By Monarchy - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Why Did Romans Fear Rule By Monarchy

However, with Tarquinius Priscus, it was said that royal inheritance flowed from the female relations of the deceased monarch. The Roman kings were therefore chosen primarily on their virtues and not royal lineage.

The powers wielded by the king are difficult to determine since some historians attribute them with those possessed by later Republican leaders, mainly the Consuls. Modern historians believe that Rome's kings were the chief executive for the senate and the people, and that real power was exercised by the people. Other historians believe that the king had the supreme power and the senate and people only had checks upon his power.

The king had the sole right to auspice in behalf of Rome as its chief augur. No public business could be undertaken without consent of the gods whose will were made known through the auspices. Thus, the king is treated with reverence as he is considered the mediator between the gods and the people. The king is therefore the head of the national religion and the is its foremost religious executive. He had the power to control the Roman calendar. He also conducted all religious ceremonies, created lower religious officers, and appointed their officials. Aside from his religious authority, the king also held supreme military and judicial authority by virtue of the Imperium. It was his for life and was protected and gave him immunity from being tried for his actions. This allowed him to exercise vast military powers that could not be checked, for he was commander of all Roman legions. The kings wielded enormous power since there was also an absence of laws which protected citizens from the abuses of officials possessing the Imperium.
The Imperium also allowed the king to make legal judgments since he also acts as the chief justice of Rome. He had overall jurisdiction over cases brought before him, whether they are civil or criminal, although he could also assign pontiffs to function as minor judges. The powers vested upon him by the Imperium made the king supreme in both peace and war. Although a council advices the king during trials, it has no power over the king and cannot control his decisions. Some historians believe that the king's decision was final and cannot be appealed. Others say that an appeal can be made by a patrician or member of the elite, during meetings of the Curiate Assembly, which elected magistrates and exercised judicial and legislative powers.
The king also had the power to nominate or appoint all officials to offices. He appoints a Tribunus Celerum who is similar to the Praetorian Prefect, and served as the commander of the king's bodyguard. The king appointed the Tribune upon entering office and the Tribune was required to eave his office upon the death of the king. The Tribune was second in rank to the king and possessed the authority to convene the Curiate Assembly.
The king also appointed the Praefectus Urbanus who performed the duties of warden of the city. The prefect assumed all the king's powers and abilities when the monarch is absent from the city. He assumed the king's power that he was also bestowed the Imperium while inside the city. There came a point in time when the king also acquired the sole right to appoint patricians to the senate.
The Senate and the Curiate Assembly had very little power and authority under the Roman kings. They were not independent bodies that could meet and discuss affairs of state. They could only be convened by the king and their discussions are limited to matters which are presented before them by the monarch. The Curiate Assembly had the power to pas laws presented before ...Show more

Summary

From its founding, Rome was ruled by kings, including Romulus who was the city's founder. After Romulus, the Roman kings were elected by the people to serve for life. None of the monarchs relied on military force to gain the seat of power…
Author : jaronkertzmann
Why Did Romans Fear Rule By Monarchy essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Why Did Romans Fear Rule By Monarchy"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Fear
Looking back on it now I see that it was a child’s naivete and the fortunate 8 years growing up that had not resulted in any traumatic experiences, yet. I am not certain that most fears develop in childhood; perhaps some are learned later in life through one’s experience, and yes I have those too.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
United Monarchy
United Monarchy At this point, the different tribes (twelve) were led by the “judges”. The exact function of the judges is not defined clearly in the text. During this time, there was no single place of worship and Israelites believed in worshipping Yahweh alone.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Fear
This understanding of identity formation and the ways that the individual can reject foreign ideas based upon this is an exceptional means of understanding the way that fear, anger, rejection, and oftentimes violence can result from something as simple as a primal and innate fear that near or competing ideas could serve to provide a fundamental shift with regards to the way that the traditional order of things has previously been effected.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
The Constitutional Monarchy in the UK Taking Into Account: Monarch Role, Royal Prerogative, Royal Immunity, Rule of Law and Separation of Powers
This form of control is viewed to be different from that of an absolute monarchy in which a monarchy serves as the source of power in the state or the region bounded by any constitution and has the power to regulate their individual respective government policy.
20 pages (5000 words) Essay
From absolutism to monarchy
According to William Bouwsma a historian of the Renaissance period sums up such behavior stating – “Nothing so clearly indicates the limits of royal power as the fact that governments were perennially in financial trouble, unable to tap the wealth of those most able to pay, and likely to stir up a costly revolt whenever they attempted to develop an adequate income.”
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Fear
I am not afraid of making those I love unhappy, because this is not a natural way for me to be. This belief is supported by my fear of abandoning people who depend on me, of losing those I care about and of not having time to make amends if I have hurt them in any way.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Fear
I am not certain that most fears develop in childhood; perhaps some are learned later in life through one’s experience, and yes I have
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Absolutism and Limited Monarchy
Religion is another factor that made the monarch of England questionable. This is because there were many Protestants in England and whose puritanism influence and movement opposed strongly the monarch. Institutional influence was another factor during this
1 pages (250 words) Essay
The Hawaiian Monarchy
This marked the begging of the expansive spirit of king Kamehameha, which enabled him to acquire the largest Armada ever in Hawaii ever seen, by 1803.Fierce and
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Romans 12
(17-21) Roman 12:1-2 explains the apostle having closed the part of his epistle wherein he argues and proves various doctrines, which are practically applied, here urges important duties from gospel principles. Paul entreated the Romans, as his brethren in
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation