StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Are immunities of senior state officials applicable to jus cogens violations - Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Are immunities of senior state officials applicable to jus cogens violations

As such, the question whether acts of State officials are applicable to violations of jus cogens is necessary to be tackled in the light of several cases decided by the International Court of Justice (ICJ for brevity) and in recent times, by the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the Rome Statute.
It is well to be emphasized at the outset that under the present generally accepted principles of international law, heads of states and senior state officials are not exempted from the responsibility in the international community for international crimes. 1 Any controversy that may emerge would fall under the jurisdictional question relating to the procedural aspect of the law. Hence, in this paper, several cases would be cited particularly those which sparked heated debates among scholars and imminent jurist in international law. At this juncture, it is worthy to mention the two principles of immunities under international law which are immunity ratione personae and ratione materiae. The former being attributed to the person and it follows him wherever he may be, and for his conduct which may be official or not. The latter on the other hand pertains to immunity which is necessarily included in the conduct of a head of state and senior state officials which relates to their official functions as representative of his or her State. It is then important to take a look at the history of state immunity and discern how it evolved over time.
The Evolution of State Immunity
Between the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the doctrine of foreign state was regarded as absolute since foreign states were recognized as having the privilege of complete immunity from another forum's jurisdiction. By the early twentieth century, after World War I, Allied nations adopted a limited approach to immunity to address the complexity of the growing participation of states in global trade. Thus, the concept of acta jure imperii, wherein a state's conduct which are governmental in nature were acknowledged as having full immunity, and acta jure gestionis, wherein commercial or private acts of states that deals with trade are not endowed with immunity. 2 Thus, if the act falls under the category of acta jure imperii, full immunity is accorded to state officials. However, for those falling under commercial ventures or otherwise termed as acta jure gestionis, a state may be sued for breach of contract along with the concerned state official. On the other hand, as the world shrunk, so to speak, violations of fundamental human rights have been discovered and made public. These violations are apart from the ones which were the cause of wars between nations. Several jurists, commentators and heads of states argued that there should at least be an impartial tribunal which would render judgment upon persons accused of war and crimes against humanity. The concept of state immunity was thus regarded as applicable only to those acts of states which do not transgress norms which are regarded as necessary to attain order in the international community. Consequently, several statutes were enacted and tribunals were established precisely to address the growing concern of the states about serious violations of peremptory norms, from which violators would only invoke state immunity to avoid punishment. At present, State immunity is not regarded as an absolute state right under the international law. Instead, state immunity ...Show more


Jus Cogens principle in International Law is the peremptory norm in which each State must observe with utmost good faith. It enjoins States and its leaders to act in accordance with basic principles in international law such as prohibition of using force or aggression against another state or acts which are deemed to be crimes against humanity…
Author : camden72
Are immunities of senior state officials applicable to jus cogens violations essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Are immunities of senior state officials applicable to jus cogens violations"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Human Rights Violations
Gross human rights violations have compelled some LGBT persons to flee their homes, fearing for their safety, and seeking sanctuary in countries with, what they perceive to be better human rights protection laws. However research seems to indicate that in numerous instances, some host countries have displayed homophobic attitudes which seem to further marginalize these LGBTs.
11 pages (2750 words) Essay
Immunities: Immunities enjoyed by state officials
On the other hand, immunity can be abused and state officials or agents of states can invoke immunity to escape prosecution for crimes against humanity. This work attempts to examine the international statutes on immunity of agents of states and examine select cases to assess the state of the international statutes on the subject.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Mass human rights violations
Majority of the people in almost all the countries in the world conceive that human rights are associated with the attributes of optimal protection and respect.
13 pages (3250 words) Essay
Traffic Violations

The study leads to the conclusion that from the standpoint of safety, traffic violations can be classified into three types including the personal safety, speed, and vehicular violations. These types differ from each other depending upon what is required by traffic law in each of them and whose safety is at risk in each case.

3 pages (750 words) Essay
Domestic and International Law: The Scope and Application of Jus Cogens
The aim of this essay is to analyse the scope and application of the jus cogens that includes the mandatory standards regulation of the international laws.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Senior Philosophy
Aristotle determines that happiness is a prerogative for a successful and fulfilling life. According to him, happiness is a relative concept that means different things to different people. He says, “Happiness depends on ourselves” (Aristotle 121).
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
The two people without caller ID kept asking who I was. They seemed almost upset that somebody was calling them without saying anything. It was difficult for me to do this violation without laughing,
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Public Officials and Morality
The author of this paper states that public elected officials are in most cases put in office due to their good personal and professional qualification. Leaders run critical offices on behalf of the people and are always open for scrutiny. Their moral stand directly affects the decisions they make in office.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
HIPAA Violations
“However, when this Act was incepted in 1996, the internet was still in its early stages, and with the evolution of the internet, the Act had to be updated periodically” (Fernald 26). The Secretary of Health and
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Violations of human rights
Therefore, these privileges are secured in the structure of the countries. The problem of human privileges is that individuals and countries have a different thoughtful of the term and its safety. In some areas
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Contact Us