This paper is a reaction to the 1996 film "Michael Collins" directed by Neil Jordan and starring Liam Neeson, Julia Roberts (as Kitty Kiernan), and Aidan Quinn (as Harry Boland). Collins played an important role in Ireland's struggle to be independent from the British, which had ruled Ireland for many centuries.
Collins, one of those who participated as a foot soldier in the rebellion, was captured after the crushing of the Easter Rebellion. However, he was released and began carrying out and played an important role in revitalizing the armed resistance. He pioneered urban guerrilla warfare.
He established a grassroots army of volunteers made up of young idealists and poor workers to fight for freedom. Others acted as an intelligence network that looked for information to expose British informers and spies, Irishmen who by working for the British were seen as traitors to the cause of national independence.
This basic formula of forming an informal army, acting in small effective and closely-knit teams, consisting of poor and marginalized idealists, most of them young, who then used violence, force, and fear to intimidate an overwhelmingly powerful and organized ruling government, has been copied by later rebel leaders and Marxist revolutionary thinkers, notably Che Guevara and Carlos Marighella.
Collins realized that attacking an organized force on the latter's own terms characterized by larger numbers and superior firepower would be futile. Having small forces attacking specific targets with impunity and relying on precise information would, and proved to be, more effective.
What resulted were years of brutal violence. However, instead of pressuring the British to capitulate, there would be an escalating spiral of death and conflict, leading to the formation and growth in size and power of what would later become the Irish Republican Army (IRA).
This background of violence, brutality, and revenge is the basis of the troubles that continue to wreck Northern Ireland and has served as the inspiration for terrorist groups that endanger the world to this day.
The film showed that while Collins deep in his heart was not in favor of brutal violence to achieve the noble end of freedom for which he fought, he found it the best way to catch attention and increase the popular support for their cause. In retaliation to the Irish's guerrilla tactics, every act was met with greater impunity by the British Army, which in turn had a legitimate reason of its own for suppressing an armed rebellion of what it believed to be a part of the United Kingdom.
Realizing that violence was not a long-term solution but was becoming part of a problem that was becoming bigger, Collins showed his willingness to compromise after the British agreed to allow the Irish to establish a political party that legitimately participated in the British parliament.
This strategy of legitimizing rebellious groups by making them participate in the democratic mainstream has likewise been used by nations to diffuse violence and allow due process to take its course. But it was short-lived, as the newly-elected Sinn Fein party representatives changed their minds and declared independence for Ireland, organizing the IRA to counteract British efforts to suppress the rebellion.
This turned out to be the cause of his downfall, because as his power within the independence movement grew, his comrades ...
Cite this document
(“Film Michael Collins Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/275925-film-michael-collins
(Film Michael Collins Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Film Michael Collins Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/275925-film-michael-collins.
Lead character Jasmin Munchgstettner played by Marianne Sagebrecht is a German tourist with her husband played by Hans Stadlbauer. While driving across the California desert, the couple has a fight and she stormed out of the car, odging her suitcase out of the trunk to thesolitary highway as her husband drove off.
The Library of Congress explained that the main reason for the inclusion of the film into the US National Film Registry’s gallery was the film’s cultural, historical and aesthetic significance. The film also won the National Society of Critics Award, and thereby underscoring its extent of success (Mean Streets, 1).
The movie takes a closer look at the life of the leader, his arrest and release from jail, controversial love affair with his fellow fighter’s girlfriend and his death. The movie is about guerrilla insurgency and guerrilla warfare in Ireland that resisted the British rule in the country.
Just as any other film, Punishment Park employs several film production features and elements to earn effectiveness of communicate. Unlike any other film gene, pseudo-documentary strives to provide reflections of actual events (Nelmes 22). The film does this by depicting the immense hostility of the government agency against the counterculture.
The movie is based on the concept that American democracy has disintegrated by greed and corruption. The state of Michigan has the highest unemployment rate of 15 percent with situation even graver in the northern part of the state preceded by factories getting closed resulting in the downfall of the auto industry.
In its raw, visceral beauty, the movie calls to mind the Greek tragedies of old replete with characters all strangely fated to some tragic, remorseless destiny (Ebert). And as its plot unfolds, overtones of loyalty, betrayal, revenge, and salvation all come to surface.
Since the film supports its message through seemingly incontrovertible and incontestable video and audio evidence, the embrace and acceptance of its propagandist message is easy. A critical analysis of the film, however, indicates that its message is somewhat at odds with facts and if it were able to seemingly support its claims, that is largely due to Michael Moore's careful selection of images and sound bytes and, more importantly, their de-contextualization.
Through his life, he produced a vast number of plays, of the highest quality, and The Merchant of Venice is one of the most notable ones he wrote.
Under the direction of Michael Radford, The Merchant of Venice film is a critically highly praised screen adaptation of one of the best Shakespeare's plays.
The plot of the film talks about these two relationships, which are different in many ways.
The movie is set around the heat of the Italian summer, in the Tuscan villa, in an unspecified time line, though it
With choreographed and jaw-dropping skills, the film portrays the conflicting interest of a girl and a train. The film is set in a pacing, jeopardy, and stunts that are managed to split-second perfection.
The General is a 1926 film
1 Pages(250 words)Movie Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic Film Michael Collins for FREE!