You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Hiring and Firing Professors
Pages 3 (753 words)
I strongly believe that there are very few instances, if at all, of bad teachers being hired. They are hired based on certain criteria that evaluate their qualifications and competencies. They only perform less after they are hired; and there are several factors that contribute to make them less competent like: age, wages, type of school, working conditions, other attractions.
Moreover, the type of school is another point of consideration. A private school and a public school have different working conditions. This may include tenure and security. For private schools, teachers are less secure and are easily dismissed from service.
Another cause is the tendency to do research more over teaching because research is more attractive and more interesting for it gives more pay and is counted much more in terms of professional advancement (Etzioni).
Amitai Etzioni's "Confessions" gives insights on this question of student participation. According to him: "On the question of hiring, firing and promoting faculty, we favored some student participation." This is through the "fine teaching-evaluation instrument" which is a questionnaire given out to students by semester to evaluate the professor's teaching. He adds that the result must be "given to committee which passes on promotions and renewal of contracts, as a students report on teaching." The student assessment of the teaching performance "would provide some systematic information and thus might increase the reward - and maybe pressure - for good teaching, at least as seen by the students."
I agree with the idea of Etzioni that students must have a part in the hiring and firing of professors but limited only on the teaching-evaluation instr ...
Not exactly what you need?