StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Business Law in Australia (Tort) - Case Study Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Business Law in Australia (Tort)

Since such affected people are described as neighbours, the doctrine of duty is usually described as the neighbour principle. For the purpose of this doctrine a person's neighbours are individuals who are directly and proximately affected by act of commission or omission of that person.
Subsequently, most of the developments have taken place in the rule of negligence. These developments have given another definition to the neighbour principle by Lord Wilberforce. In Anns v Merton London2, the House of Lords established a two - stage test. First, there should be an adequate Proximity or neighbourhood relationship in the reasonable observation of the defendant's negligence which would cause damage to the interests of the claimant. If this holds good then a prima facie duty of care becomes apparent. Second, it is essential to determine whether any issues exist, which hinder the applicability of the duty of care that is owed to persons, or that try to negate it wholly, or reduce its scope.
However the two - stage test faced much criticism in respect of its applicability which is broad in its scope. As such the current test of duty of care in the areas of proximity, foresight and fairness in establishing the former had been adopted by the courts. Under this test, claimants were required to establish three aspects which they consider to be a duty of care. First, there should be a violation that could have been reasonably foreseen and which was certain to cause injury to persons in the claimant's position. Second, there should be a reasonable and adequate proximity between the parties and third, it should be fair, justifiable and reasonable to impose the liability. This test's interpretation has been evidenced in the case of Caparo Industries v Dickman3. In this case the decision of the Court of Appeal was rescinded by the House of Lords.
If one accepts that the principle in Donoghue v. Stevenson4 to be precise, then by implication the decision of the House of Lords in the cases of Murphy5 is correct. In the Murphy case, the House of Lords did not grant compensation for the economic loss in relation to the damage caused to the building. It was considered to be unimportant, that this ruin was capable of harming other buildings and persons.
Moreover, it was held that an impeachment of actual damage would result if there was public justification of negligence based entirely on the decision in Donoghue v. Stevenson. Furthermore, it was opined on the basis of the principle established in Donoghue v. Stevenson, that the normative importance of information that a flaw was hazardous was irrelevant after such a defect was noticed6.
Lord Bridge opined in this context that if injury to a person or damage to a building was due to a latent flaw in the chattel, then the manufacturer was to be held liable for the damage caused. In addition, he stated that if the latent defect came to light prior to the occurrence of damage, then the principle established in the Donoghue v. Stevenson case would be inapplicable. Accordingly, the chattel, under consideration, would be deemed to be defective but not dangerous7.
In the context of real estate, a builder would be liable for constructing a building that had dangerous defects. The builder would be held liable in the event of such a defect remaining undisclosed until personal injury or damage to some other property transpired. 250. This latency requirement has been abandoned and accordingly, the principle of ...Show more


The case of Donoghue v Stevenson1 established the principle of the duty of care. The House of Lords acknowledged a new relationship of a duty of care between the manufacturers and the customers who utilise the products. This ruling however is considered to be narrow in its scope…
Author : borerkelly
Business Law in Australia (Tort) essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Business Law in Australia (Tort)"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Business and law
This is because the written law that provides for the application of the principles of common law and equity in these the countries does not expressly state that these principles are in force. 1It however provides that the High Court or the Supreme Court, and the Magistrates Courts exercise their jurisdiction in accordance with these principles, but subject to such modifications as local circumstances render necessary.
14 pages (3500 words) Case Study
Business law
The respondents (growers) role was to rear chicken based in “Hunter Valley Region.” These chicks were supplied to them by the appellants (Steggles) whose processing plant was at Beresfield. When chicks had grown, they were picked and paid for by appellants.
14 pages (3500 words) Case Study
Tort Law Essay
Essentially, where there has been a situation where an individual suffers a loss and is injured as a result of the negligence of another, they may be entitled to claim losses from the negligent individual or party. Broadly speaking, in order for there to be a valid claim in negligence, there must be a duty of care from the plaintiff to the claimant; secondly, there must have been a breach of this duty; and thirdly, a causal link both factually and legally must exist between the breach and the harm suffered by the individual.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
Business Law,law of tort
The words 'the celebrity lawyer now finds himself in the frame' are in fact defamatory since when they are interpreted, they mean that the lawyer found himself in hot soup trouble. 1 The defamatory statement is written hence it qualifies as a libel. My first advice to Nick Freeman is to bring an action for libel which is adorable without the plaintiff having to prove special damage.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Tort Law
The author was a journalist who wrote a book entitled "Bent Coppers: The Inside Story of Scotland Yard's Battle Against Police Corruption" which was published by the publisher Orion Publishing Group Ltd. The author had been an officer in the Metropolitan police until his resignation upon a finding of an internal disciplinary panel.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
The Law of Tort
For instance a claimant can sustain an action in trespass and not in negligence notwithstanding that he or she has not incurred damages.2 Bridgit Dimond explains that: Trespass to the Person is often founded on assault, battery and false imprisonment.
20 pages (5000 words) Case Study
Law of Tort
Identify and explain the legal issues these concerns raise in relation to nuisance and advise the Board of any potential liability they have to the complainants. In this instant case we are presented with a case of nuisance where all the elements are present.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Business and marketing Law
Under this law of tort we see that duties are imposed by law such as we should not be negligent of others, therefore this duty is owed to the community as a whole. Therefore, in this type of law their must be an infringement on the civil right of an individual, through which the wrong doer has to compensate the injured party in the community, this injured party is therefore supposed to obtain his compensation by taking the action through which his legal rights are violated.
9 pages (2250 words) Case Study
British Tort Law
In England and Wales, the law of tort covers five types of offenses: trespass of land, trespass against goods, trespass against person, negligence and defamation (Wikipedia). Trespass on land, goods and person is altogether the most common type of tort, but in all cases the main concern is the allocation of responsibility for whatever losses are sustained.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
Contract Law Degree Case Study
Rupert has completed the work to the full satisfaction of Herbert and he has evidently accepted the fact too. But he paid Rupert only 25% less of the cost of the listed items as interim payments instead of 10% less. There arises a breach of contract on the part of Herbert since he did not pay as he had agreed to at the beginning of the contract.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Contact Us