The Heart of Atlanta Hotel was located in Atlanta, Georgia. This facility denied the rights of admission to Black Americans, in direct violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The suit filed by the owner of this motel questioned the powers extended to Congress by the Civil Rights Act in the domain of interstate commerce. In addition, he validated his stance of discrimination against Black Americans on the grounds of the rights extended to him by the Fifth and Thirteenth Amendment. The United States justified its authority under the Commerce Clause and denied any violation of the Fifth and Thirteenth Amendment Rights of the appellant.
On December 14, 1964, a nine-judge bench led by Justice Tom C. Clark unanimously voted in favor of the United States of America. The court validated the authority of Congress in the sphere of Interstate Commerce, as far as the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was concerned. It denied any violation of the Thirteenth Amendment rights of the appellant. ...
Supreme Court Media).
4. Reason or Rule
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited the practice of racial discrimination in public accommodations whose operations had an impact on the interstate commerce. The Heart of Atlanta motel located in Atlanta, Georgia denied admission to African Americans, in direct contradiction and violation of the Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The owner of this motel stated that the interference of the Federal Government denied him of his Fifth Amendment rights, which allowed him to run his business as he pleased. In addition, the owner also claimed the denial of his Thirteenth Amendment rights in the sense that he had been burdened with involuntary servitude by the United States.
I thoroughly agree with the judgment given by the honorable Court and find it in consonance with the fundamental aspirations and principles enshrined in the United States Constitution.
"Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. U.S. 379 U.S. 241 (1964)". OYEZ. U.S. Supreme
Court Media. 5 August 2009