Leadership can be effectively defined simply as influence (Maxwell 1993). A person in a certain position may have a good idea, yet if he doesn’t have the skill to influence others to believe those ideas he has, he cannot be called a leader. In the case of the jury, every juror has to have its own conviction regarding the case to be tried. It is the trait of an effective leader that is needed to be able to come up with a credible decision among the jury. Jury is referred to as a group of randomly-selected citizens who have been invited for the hearing of a case in their own area. Their function is to study the case and make a decision with regards to the evidences gathered, guided by the rules of the law (Legal Explanation 2007). In the critically acclaimed 1957 movie, Twelve Angry Men, the life of the accused, an 18-year-old male who allegedly stabbed his father, greatly relies upon the decision of the jury. The movie implies that if Juror number 8 hadn’t shown leadership skill, the boy will most likely be sentenced to death in just one trial. Poor juristical performance is seen among the rest of eleven jurors as they just decided with their prejudices and the desire to leave the court’s humid atmosphere brought by the summer season....
The Jury approached the case with the Socratic Method combined with "influence" principle displayed by Juror number 8. Socrates is said to famously instruct his students through a series of carefully constructed questions designed to force self-examination and lead them to a conclusion. This resulted both in the teacher and student being better able to order their thoughts and arguments into a stronger, more coherent theory toughened by relentless hammering in the workings of debate (Tucker 2007). Through the Socratic Method, Juror number 8 indirectly challenged the rest of eleven jurors who were eager to have the case be decided promptly, but eventually resulted in having them reconsider it. This was influenced by Juror number 8's consideration of reasonable doubt.
The jury is also a team. This is justifiably depicted in the movie. The team inevitably deals with factors like task, maintenance, and self-centered roles (Lechner 2003). For example, the task of the team in the film is to come up with the proper decision if the accused is to be acquitted or to be sentenced to death. The vote of eleven jurors of guilty and a juror of not guilty, was interrupted but due to acceptable reason. Changes set in when a leader wanted to achieve the justifiable task given to them. It is expected that in a team, there is always a challenge for team work if it is to consider the individual behavior of the team players.
Self-centered roles can be seen by the character of Juror number 3, played by Lee J. Cobb. His quick-to-convict and defiant nature made him difficult to go with the team decision, and it is the challenge that the team had to overcome. Through encouragement and the influence approach of the Juror number 8 along with the