However, certain oddities and speculation in the way towards the findings point to specific weaknesses of the research in methods and approaches used. The empirical study is based on a well-defined theoretical framework and its finding that approves the merit of the hypothesis. The loose ends of the study result mainly derive from the inadequacy of the relevant data in general, and that of the Netherlands in particular, where sociological factors limit the findings of the study. The speculative nature of the finding towards the end of the study constrains the appeal of the empirical result.
There is a great relevance to this type of research and the objectives of the study prove this point. The research contributes to the study of complementarities among HR dimensions and the selection of Ireland and the Netherlands for data collection, where no such studies are conducted, also proves to be its strength. The introduction states the hypothesis clearly and illustrates the significance of the study. The hypothesis is logically presented, leading to the empirical analysis of the study. As the authors of Research Paper Handbook instruct the researcher, "Your thesis will show the special nature of your paper." (Lester Jr & Lester Sr 2005). The paper clearly establishes the thesis that "the high performance HR management system is the most effective form of the HR management in enhancing the performance of the employees," with the research method used. It also succeeds in emphasizing that "this superior effectiveness in part is derived from a complementarities among the five HR dimensions." (Horgan & Muhlau 2006). The clarification added for the ineffectiveness of the theory in the Netherlands almost satisfies the finding of the study. The authors provide relevant reasons for the varying result of the research. Overall, the research paper succeeds in establishing the hypothesis with explanations about the exception and its reasons.
The empirical study fails in some places, especially, due to the inadequacy of the approach to the study. We notice the insufficiency of data right from the beginning and the methods adopted to oversee this defect are less convincing. A wider scope of the data in volume, especially from the Netherlands, would have made the finding more reliable. Also, there is lack of questions related to the sociological peculiarities of the Netherlands that would solve the speculative nature of conclusion. The alternative approach selected to circumvent the two problems associated with main approach to detect synergy effects also seems ineffective. There is also some concern with regard to the ethical validity of the work. The methods of arriving at conclusion raise such doubts about the ethical reliability from a deontological or teleological viewpoint.
A. Evaluation of the research methods:
As the work by Saunders et al suggests understanding the research philosophy and approaches is of great significance. Analyzed from this criterion, the research paper contains a well established research method that covers the inability of other methods. The research study first establishes three different mechanisms and how their combination can boost performance. Then the paper concentrates on applying these to the five HR dimen