StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Subverting the Processes of Peer Review - Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Subverting the Processes of Peer Review

Hwang was indeed a brainy researcher. He had efficiently kept his collaborators, manipulating them with their own personal motives. With that, he had managed to maintain his established credibility within the span of his research and prominence.
Hwang was a national hero in South Korea and was rose to fame after claiming a series of remarkable breakthroughs in the field of stem cell research. Despite the notable absence of any of the scientific data needed to probe the validity of his research, Hwang's several claims were well received by the South Korean media and public. They have been so attracted with his claim of immeasurable economic prospect that his research was said to be promising (Wikipedia, 2008). With such renowned standing, he maintained and expands his research team. Building it in a rigid hierarchical structure had made him extremely dominant among his researchers regardless of their titles.
His collaborators worked for his fraud and some had even so consistent with their support despite the arousal of controversies. With their firm determination to back him up, he had managed to publicize his said noble study. Dr. Roh head of Seoul fertility clinic had agreed to collaborate with Hwang despite the anomalous way of obtaining the egg cell from paid donors and two of their junior researchers. When the controversy was exposed he even publicly admits the deed claiming that he was solely responsible and Hwang was unaware of the said anomaly. This was to cover up despite the fact that Hwang himself had distributed egg donation consent forms to his researchers and even personally escorted one to the MizMedi Hospital to take the egg extraction procedure. All these fabrication were for the assured credit on what had been thought as a promising research.
In Hwang's laboratory, every order must be followed having him as a supervisor. Two of his junior researcher had even donated their eggs despite the inconvenience of the procedure. At a point, one of the researcher/donor in her attempt to disclose the fact had retracted her statement due to alleged coercion. Moreover, his team obediently follows when Hwang told them to make it look as if there were 11 stem cells when not even half that number was there. These were with the knowledge that they would have credit on the published discovery. On the contrary, all their efforts in the research would be wasted if they would disclose the fact.
After having acquired a celebrity status in South Korea, Hwang actively sought to establish every possible tie to political and ...Show more

Summary

The supposed noble stem cell discovery Hwang Woo Suk led should have been so significant that its controversy had become an issue on medicine, ethics, and politics. It had incurred an enormous funding both from public and private sectors in and outside Korea…
Author : boreilly
Subverting the Processes of Peer Review essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Subverting the Processes of Peer Review"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Peer review
Consequently, this has yielded to colossal funding especially by the states’ regimes in aiding their citizens to manage it and prolong their lives. For instance, US contends of having used approximately more than $174 billion 2007 both in managing and treatment of the disease.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Peer Review
The paper itself is interesting, but the title needs a major overhaul. The claim is that patient power is low because we as a people have entrusted our care to the likes of doctors and pharmaceutical companies who we may not even be able to trust, given the fact that there are an alarmingly high number of deaths each year of people who are taking normally-prescribed medications.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Peer review
Written in simple language, the article is clear and easy to understand. Given that the author of the article cites from various authoritative and reputable sources, mainly journal articles, it may be
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Peer review
I am not clear though whether you consider the alterations in grammar, abbreviations and use of symbols as a “setback” for the English language or as you mentioned an “advancement”. You could have
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Peer Review
The most memorable part of the essay is the portion where revelation is made that up to today, not much effort has been made to better the sovereignty of lesser groups by refusing to implement regulations and policies that serve
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Peer review
The writer’s point in this study appears to be about the impact of skin-to-skin contact between mother and child immediately after birth of the child. To this extent I believes the writer achieve to state categorically the thesis and an outline of the research
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Peer-review
The author goes on to review literature related to the functions of microglia cells in iron regulation which often act as a powerful form of defense for the Central Nervous System (CNS). The conclusion sums
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Peer review
This hypothesis clearly identifies the two variables which are sales and per capita. A relationship between Per capita income and sales is created and the cause effects clearly determined. In
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Peer review
If it were not so, he would not have given such a precise and accurate definition. The other strength is that the answers provided are correct and relevant (Gorringe, 2009). Besides, they are
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Peer review
??s question, ‘Why is it that so many times in history the meeting of two cultures has ended in painful consequences for the less powerful?’ relates to the thesis in terms of exploring the reasons for unfavorable consequences of cultural interaction. The writer has
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment