HISTORICAL ANALOGY: "Analogy is both the cognitive process of transferring information from a particular subject (the analogue or source) to another particular subject (the target), and a linguistic expression corresponding to such a process. In a narrower sense, analogy is an inference or an argument from a particular to another particular, as opposed to deduction, induction, and abduction, where at least one of the premises or the conclusion is genera"…
"According to public opinion polls, most Americans feel the U.S. economy has been moving in the wrong direction. Indeed, an analysis of several important economic indicators shows they're right. In apples-to-apples comparisons of annualized data, these indicators of the country's economic well-being show mostly negative change during President George W. Bush's administration, compared to mostly positive change during President Bill Clinton's administration. Presidents obviously do not control everything that happens on their watch. But it is fair -- and entirely appropriate -- to judge how they play the economic hands they are dealt. Bush's economic policies have diverged dramatically from Clinton's, and PPI believes the disparities in economic outcomes under each administration are attributable at least in part to those policy choices". (Bush vs. Clinton: An Economic Performance)
There are also differences in terms of Debt Reduction of the two administrations of Bush and Clinton. "The national debt is the net amount of debt held by the federal government ($3.9 trillion in 2003).5 It increased under both administrations (in today's dollars). But under Clinton the debt rose more slowly and GDP rose faster than under Bush. The result is that the ratio of debt to GDP went down an average of 3.89 percent per year during the Clinton years, but has gone up an average of 0.94 percent per year during the Bush years". (Debt Reduction Relative to GDP4)
While comparing employment opportunities of Bush and Clinton Administration, it is categorically clear that "Employment was the third measure Forbes used to judge economic performance. How many people hold full time jobs. When Clinton took office there were 109 million jobs in the U.S. Three-and-a-half years later, there were 120 million, or a net growth of 11 million jobs. In raw numbers, this is the most prodigious record of job creation in modern history. In percentage terms, it trails only Jimmy Carter's accomplishment of adding 10 million jobs in the late seventies.
Bush's record on employment is equally legendary though for the opposite reason. When he took office, there were 132 million jobs in the U.S. Today, more than three-and-a-half years later, there are just over 131 million for a net loss of one million jobs. The standard-and truthful-rebuke is that Bush has been the first president since Herbert Hoover to have presided over a net loss of jobs. As with GDP, Bush is now out trying to claim heroic results for a recent short period but the odium of the larger failure, especially when put into historical context, is inescapable. Clinton 3; Bush 0" (Evaluating Bush's Economic Performance: A Field Guide for the Perplexed)
"When it comes to inflation, Bush faced a huge increase in worldwide oil prices, but Clinton did not. In the consumer price index that excludes energy prices, inflation averaged 2.1 percent in the past four years, down from 2.9 percent in 1993-96.
When calculating real incomes, however, nominal increases in wage and benefits are reduced by total inflation, including higher energy prices. This would seem to put the past four year ...
Cite this document
(“Bush vs. Clinton: An Economic Performance Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/278534-bush-vs-clinton-an-economic-performance
(Bush Vs. Clinton: An Economic Performance Essay)
“Bush Vs. Clinton: An Economic Performance Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/278534-bush-vs-clinton-an-economic-performance.
(79.53 x 99.85 cm) (canvas) 40 1/4 x 47 1/4 x 4 in. (Minneapolis Institute of the Arts, 2011). The art work is considered realistic as it clearly depicts images of people helping each other to put a wooden boat on shore. The author was “was born on April 26, 1798, in Charenton-St-Maurice, France” (Pioch, 2002, par.
Though both Obama’s and Hillary’s plans include mechanisms that make private and public health insurance more available to the citizens, the Obama’s plan, unlike the Hillary’s plan, offers citizens, except children, the freedom to opt out of private health insurance if they so choose.
How did the domestic policies of presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton reflect the rise of conservatism in American politics?
Tannsjo states in his book that the Concise Oxford Dictionary defines conservatism as that attitude which is possessed by the person who wants to “maintain existing institutions” (3) when he comes into the government.
On the one hand, the main difference between these approaches was caused by political situations and foreign policies provided by Bill Clinton and George Bush. Clinton's defeat motivated him to adopt a more cautious, pragmatic, and moderate approach reflected the post-Cold war situation needed the policy of "engagement and enlargement".
There are highly qualified candidates that are challenging the current Republican administration. Add Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to this mix and America is faced with some real decisions to make in the coming year and a half.
According to the report the increase in GDP is attributed to the sustainable consumer spending. Consumption is boosted by the prevailing low interest rate regime coupled by rising house prices and bullish stock market prospects. As such, consumers exhibit a greater propensity to spend rather than save.
ed States, improved and maintained strong foreign relations, achieved meaningful environmental progress, and utilized the military with discretion and effectiveness. On the other hand, Bush has gotten the U.S. bogged down in a Quagmire in Iraq while failing to face an overt
Over the years, several presidents have excelled in uniting the American people and leading the world in democratic principles. Although some have been prominent for restoring American economic might, others have been outstanding
My actions in management as shown in the case of laying-of employees at the company are a clear show that I have a high standard of ethics. At times situations make provide for me complex options hence my ethics
The essay "Leadership Styles: John F. Kennedy vs George W. Bush" analyzes the threat encountered by President John F. Kennedy that was the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 which was such an intense standoff between the Soviet Union and the United States that it could have set the stage for a nuclear war.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Bush vs. Clinton: An Economic Performance for FREE!