Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Morality and Rights - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : zaria75

Summary

Sometimes it looks as though there is no distinction between law and morality, because a moral person/society has to be good, law-abiding and ancient Greek writers vouch for that. Looked at it minutely, there exists a sea of difference between the two, because though morality has formed the base of law, it has not remained so in modern times…

Extract of sample
Morality and Rights


"That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant," Dworkin (1994, p.9).
Over centuries, morality had been mercurial, while Law was not, though there is a constant need to adapt to changing social requirements. Killing troublemakers and animals was moral at one point and not so now. Today, recreational drugs, homosexuality, prostitution etc. are legally accepted.
"To grasp fully where law and morality meet, one must also grasp where they remain divergent. ..Of greatest interest in that theoretical endeavour, of course, is the matter of pinning down whether and how moral principles can enter into those processes. Only by adequately addressing themselves to that matter can positivists come up with satisfactorily precise analyses of the workings of legal systems," Kramer (2004, p.11).
Morality is interpreted by religions in contradictorily and what is right for one need not be so for another. In multicultural societies this could be difficult to be enforced. It is highly contentious for law to depend on moral values alone, because the question arises, which moral values. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Morality and the Media
In other words, just as Thomas Jefferson said, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. The question is who gets to be in the place of the watchman.…
2 pages (502 words)
Punishment and Morality
There are and always have been two sides to this issue. What follows is an inquiry into issues which are integral to the cause of giving the punishment to offenders; both sides shall be represented therein, and the most plausible option shall be elucidated. Essentially, giving the punishment is considered as a moral obligation in almost all cultures and theologies around the world. It is taken as a compulsory act of reprimand, without which the integrity of the justice provider is lost, and essentially the entire process of equality suffers an emotional blow. The act of kindness is hence lost,…
2 pages (502 words)
Law and morality essay
The colonial law must look to be replaced to provide for more diverse communities that co-exist. The immigration laws of 1962 and 1996, which were used to keep Asian and Blacks from either entering the United Kingdom or preventing them from working without applying for work vouchers, is an example of an abuse of power under the guise of upholding a pretentious morality. This example should allow one to question the basis of morality, if it is to continue to be imbedded in the structures of law. Legalized prostitution and homosexual activity all fall into the realms of morality. How is the…
4 pages (1004 words)
Hiroux's Basic Principles of Morality
When we evaluate the United States through the lens of Thiroux's basic principles, we find a country that is striving for moral idealism and compromising to satisfy reality.…
4 pages (1004 words)
Ethics and Morality Aspects
And these laws are scattered in over 50 titles of the United States Code, encompassing roughly 27,000 pages" (Rosenzweig, 2003).…
6 pages (1506 words)
1. For any theory of law, justice or rights to be worthy of our support, it must involve a necessary connection with morality. To what extent, if at all, do you agree with this view?
But before this issue can be explored, many other aspects come into play so that the main question can be fully understood. Firstly, what is a connection between law and morality? What is this moral basis which we speak of? Ultimately I will argue that the contention that our acceptance of laws is based on its necessary connection with morality presupposes the existence of universal moral standards. I argue that this is not possible; that there does not and cannot exist a universal, or even societal moral basis, for ultimately the topic is subjective. By dismantling the conception that there…
16 pages (4016 words)
For any theory of law, justice or rights to be worthy of our support, it must involve a necessary connection with morality. To what extent, if at all, do you agree with this view?
crucial – referring to the fact that the reasons for the introduction of specific legal rules need to be clearly explained to the members of the society in which these rules involved; in practice, this policy is not always applied; instead, laws are developed in accordance with the personal perceptions of legislators. Under these terms, the obligations and the rights set by the laws in the context of a specific state could be doubted as of their credibility; however, there is a series of principles and concepts that are commonly used as the basis for the development of legal rules and the…
20 pages (5020 words)