President Bush accepted a law known as the "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) Act of 2001, on Jan. 8, 2002. This new act is a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and encompasses many comprehensive amendments for all public school districts in the state (McGuinn 2006).
Next is the improvement of flexibility and local control. It also provides an increased number of options for parents. Lastly it stresses on proven teaching techniques.
The phrase, "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) has become a slogan for the federal scheme to increase "accountability" in American education. But despite the fact that NCLB is a federal plan, it will be up to the individual countries to make the plans and procedures that accomplish NCLB requirements. NCLB does not provide the new mandate with adequate funds. Thus this has an effect on opinions of many schools and parents. Many states have implemented this policy by now, but this has an impact on the parents and schools as they had to face many difficulties while coping up with the policy. This article further describes the effect, changes and pros and cons of the policy in regard to its laws.(Edwards & Perry 2004)
This act generally stresses on developing American schools to a standard in which all students are given equal opportunities. As in the act it states "close the achievement gap between high- and low-performing children, especially the achievement gaps between minority and non-minority students, and between disadvantaged children and their more advantaged peers." This clearly reflects that NCLB aims to offer reasonable and equivalent opportunities to the students so that they can attain education of high standards. One of the most important terms of NCLB is the obligation that the states should set values in the field of education and should perform yearly evaluation of schools to check the progress of the school and analyze if the schools have been successful in improving the student's educational achievements. NCLB gives funds for the training of teachers; it provides special support to students who face difficulties with reading and supports immigrants and homeless students. Overall NCLB holds the states, districts and the schools to take accountability of the student's achievements. States are entitled to report the progress of students who suffer from problems like reading and writing. They are also directed to report about the students who are from different ethnic groups and who belong to families of low income. On the contrary NCLB has passed laws which act as a barrier for admission in kindergarten. Thus this proves to be a setback for the youth in their future. This youth may suffer from problems like aging, race difference and other physical and mental differences. A child cannot get admission in a kindergarten or a primary school if he has not cleared certain eligibility criterion (Panzica 2008).
The laws implemented in the United States of America are prohibiting the children from early entries into kindergarten and primary schools. This can immensely affect the future of the children as it may determine the age of the child when he finishes his high school. There is a certain age limit for any child who needs admission in the kindergarten. If one is not able to comply with the age limits then they possibly will not get an admission into the school. The Act has made the school authorities more accountable for the results of the students and this has therefore made the authorities more conscious when giving admission to a child of less capabilities. The age criterion is so strict that the schools have a certain date setup (usually in September or December) at which the child should be of the ...
Cite this document
(“No Child Left Behind Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/279094-no-child-left-behind
(No Child Left Behind Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“No Child Left Behind Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/279094-no-child-left-behind.
This paper is a literature review of the study “Parental volunteering: the resulting trends since No Child Left Behind” written by Wang and Fahey. In the observe study the researchers performed the empirical analysis where parental volunteering and its measurement are actually the central problems.
Since its implementation in 2002, the NCLB Act has been frequently criticized by the educationalists considering its negative impacts on the teaching practice and the learning tendency of the children. Owing to the educationalists’ negative perceptions of it, this Act has been interpreted as the “no psychometrician left unemployed” and the “no child left untested” Act at different times (Cochran-Smith 99).
Department of Education, 2005, par. 1). Enacted as a public law on January 8, 2002, the act was clearly described “to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind” (Public Law 107-110-Jan. 8, 2002, 2002, p.
In this regard, this paper will look into some of these underlying essential ideas as brought about by people who are in the position to affect the repealing or embracing of the law. As every good law is removed or retained,
ive of NCLB is to support and formulate the standards of education and enable the children under this scheme to attain their targets through education as well as by means of individual upshots (ESEA).
The objective of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is basically to
ade a No Child Left Behind legislation is because the United States Congress and the United States House of Representatives worried about the rise in student dropouts.
This law has several important features. First of all, until 2006, all children and high school students will
The recent past has seen a good number of schools failing to meet the set out standards. Despite this, it is evident that there is no reliable proof regarding the fact that we have stopped leaving children behind. Key to this
The action has been successful in reducing the gap between the minority and the majority as well as improving the test scores of both the minority and the majority (Tavakolian & Howell, 2012).
The no child left
Through the act, the bridge between the minority and the majority groups has been reduced. The standard test scores have also been greatly enhanced by the action through the accountability initiative program advocated by the act.
The no child left behind act of 2001 has been
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic No Child Left Behind for FREE!