This difference in the type of the two articles, in fact, applies to the way they have been presented as well as the volume and types of contents they have. Therefore, the critical analysis will obviously different as the issues to be critiqued and highlighted will not be the same. We will start with the article on debate, discuss various points and then take up the case of the second article which is present the findings of an original research.
This is a debate article in which the authors tried to discuss management issues for a specific case based on the existing evidence. So for that point of view it was like a policy related article or which ignited a debatable issue on a very important topic. Usually, nursing practice includes set pattern of well-defined ways of caring a patient. They are not involved in decision making for management of a case of a specific disease. They help in carrying out the planned management and care as prescribed by the primary physician; they are also trained to monitor the patient condition especially more sick patients in the absence of the physician and document all the related findings. As far as this article is concerned it does not related to the nursing practice.
The journal in which an article is published is also importa...
rch carredi out to assess the type of articles and the journals used for the publication; it was found that articles with important topics on some subspeciality were not published in those speciality journals rather on journals with a wider scope (McKibbon, Wilczynski & Haynes, 2004).
As this article comes under the section of debate so it does not follow the conventional principles of writing a research articles. After the abstract, it provides an overview of the topic under background which is followed by presentation of different cases on myocardial infarction and the treatment strategies for that specific case and discussion on that strategy.
Title of an article is an important component or section. It, in fact, introduces the article to the reader, provides some idea about the work carried out and inferences reached. In other words, the title of an article plays an integral part in getting the attention of a reader. The title of the article by Bogaty and Brophy is short but catchy. It attracts the reader towards the article, although it does not provide very specific information about the article.
Title moves towards abstract which summarizes an article. It facilitates a reader whether to read the whole article or not. A good abstract is brief but comprehensive enough to capture all the important aspects of a research work. This article also provides an abstract. As this article presents a debate so it does not follow the conventional principles of a research paper. Therefore, it provides background, discussion and summary; it skips methodology along with all its subsections and conclusions.
This article does not provide any introduction on the topic rather starts right away from the background.