She has the right to work in an environment free of sexual harassment and she is entitled to work where female employees are not made uncomfortable because of their gender (IET, 2002).
These may be the very reasons why the supervisor decided to take down the pin-up photographs and calendars, as well as shared Barbara Hill's views regarding them. The supervisor may have believed it in his power or authority to take down the offensive materials.
However, although according to Chambers (2001), sexually suggestive or explicit photos can be used to support a hostile environment claim, he also contends that hostile environment law involves disparate treatment, not disparate impact. Funk (2001), therefore argues that there is no judicial support for prohibiting graphic representations in the workplace as long as no gender is was made to feel inferior or treated differently.
2. Should employees be permitted to voice their opinions at work even if other employees find them misguided or offensive Does the right to free expression outweigh the right to a non-hostile working environment
According to Standler (2000), the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution establishes freedom of speech in the USA but this freedom has limitations. Only the government is prohibited from restricting speech.