StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Discussion on Evidence Law - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Discussion on Evidence Law

Evidence must conform to certain rules in order to be admissible.
At the trial of A, witness W1 indicated that A and another person was seen packaging white powder. Witness W2 indicated that A was heard telling to someone that B and A would be selling stuff in a few months. W1 again testified that A and B met H on a trip to Sydney who sold amphetamines and wanted A and B to sell these in Canberra. W2 further testified that A and B were seen injecting amphetamines. So the evidence for the cases can be summarised as follows:
2. W1 - seen A and B on a trip to Sydney where they met H who sells amphetamines and asked A and B for partnerships. This evidence may be relevant as it provides as clear lead that A and B were having business plans with H who sells amphetamines
Here some of the elements of evidence are excluded as items 3 and 1. According to the evidence given here, it may be suggested that the other items of evidence are relevant as the facts of the issue are more or less likely (see in Odgers, 2004).
Evidence that on four consecutive days in February 2005 A purchased packets of 'Polecat' brand pseudoephedrine to a total of twenty packets from three chemists in various Canberra suburbs. It is accepted that pseudoephedrine is a core constituent of amphetamines.
EFTPOS records showing that various pieces of apparatus which can...
4. W2 - seen A and B using and injecting amphetamines. This is a relevant evidence as it suggests that A and B were habituated with the uses of amphetamines.

The evidence is strong against A and B who are suspected of selling and encouraging the use of narcotics that is illegal and severely punished.

Here some of the elements of evidence are excluded as items 3 and 1. According to the evidence given here, it may be suggested that the other items of evidence are relevant as the facts of the issue are more or less likely (see in Odgers, 2004).
QUESTION 2 (10 MARKS)

The prosecution will seek to lead the following evidence at the trial of A:
Evidence that on four consecutive days in February 2005 A purchased packets of 'Polecat' brand pseudoephedrine to a total of twenty packets from three chemists in various Canberra suburbs. It is accepted that pseudoephedrine is a core constituent of amphetamines.
EFTPOS records showing that various pieces of apparatus which can be used in the production of amphetamines and which closely resemble, but are not identifiable as, some of the items found in C's premises were purchased from a wholesaler in Sydney using A's EFTPOS card on December 13 2004.
Evidence from a witness, W3 who worked at the wholesaler's Sydney premises, that J, with whom A has been living in a de facto relationship for some years, was the person who purchased the items.
EFTPOS records showing that A's EFTPOS card was used to purchase petrol in Sydney on five occasions in November and December 2004 including on December 13 2004.
Evidence from a witness, W4, that A habitually gave J his EFTPOS card to use.

Is this evidence admissible and if so on what ...Show more

Summary

W1 will testify that in April 2005 he accompanied A and B on a trip to Sydney where they met with a third person, H, who has since been gaoled for making and selling amphetamines, who said he wanted A and B to run the Canberra end of his business. The discussion canvassed a number of areas including what quantities of amphetamines would be made and sold in Canberra.
Author : jdubuque
Discussion on Evidence Law essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Discussion on Evidence Law"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Law of Evidence
Section 76 (1) provides that a confession statement may be admitted against the accused person “if it is relevant to any matter in issue” and “is not excluded by the court in pursuance of this section.”2 Section 76(2) of PACE basically provides that a confession statement may not be admitted into evidence unless the prosecution proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the statement was not obtained by oppression or as a result of “anything said or done” which likely “in the circumstances existing at the time” may render the confession “unreliable”.3 The main purpose of Section 76 is therefore to ensure that confession statements may only be admitted if they are not obtained
20 pages (5000 words) Essay
LLB Law Of Evidence coursework
Hence, the trial ought to be factual and be morally legitimate. However, cases under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 are rather complex, since the prosecutor has to establish exclusive actus reus and mens rea. Furthermore, the crown has to demonstrate that the accused actually had knowledge of what was inside a bag, the container or box and whether the defendant knowingly possessed and controlled the package itself.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Law of evidence Essay
I have also compared similar approaches taken by other jurisdictions in the area of reform and compared those to British law. The first query here would be what is evidence Evidence is the term that pertains to the material or facts submitted to a legal tribunal for the resolution of disputed questions of fact and these rules were originally developed in England for use in jury trials.Since the English Legal system is indeed the envy of the world these rules have now permeated in different forms to legal systems around the world.The development of these rules can trace its development back to the 16th century when the earliest juries could not even be said to be neutral triers of fact based
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Evidence Law
The judge is obliged to exclude a confession if the prosecution cannot refute an allegation that it was obtained under oppression. (Law Quarterly review. 1991). In other words, it is necessary that the confession obtained, should be voluntary given by defendant, and not obtained through use of physical or mental coercions, or duress.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
The Law of Evidence
That would, of course, "usurp the province of the jury" and threaten the Rule of Law by resolving the dispute according to criteria other than those embedded in the instructions. This basic requirement, more a first principle than a rule of evidence, is of much deeper significance than any of the specific exclusionary rules that are usually thought to constitute evidence law.
12 pages (3000 words) Essay
Law of Evidence 2 Assignment 2007/2008
One of the first observations that need to be made when considering the competence of a witness is the rules under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Under this Act there is a requirement that all evidence must either
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Discussion Question-Law class
Motorists are asked for their licenses and registrations and asked what their business in the neighborhood is. Police officers ask to inspect the cars, but, if occupants decline the request; they do not search the cars; neither do they seek warrants to
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Law of Evidence
It is essential to note that the accused’s guilt is for the prosecution to prove and remains there throughout the trial as in Woolmington v DPP2. It is usually very controversial when a court decides to place a
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Law of Evidence
It is upon this basis that the law of evidence is based upon which any case must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the suspect is the doer of the crimes he/she is
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Law of evidence
In this context, law and justice has been playing a guidance role for advising the people to act in accordance with several standards and legislations1. The objective of the essay is to describe the incident
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation