This is because the statistical data which Ehrenheich relies upon is hardly representative, because she provides no detailed data to support her assertion that thirty thousand dollars per year cannot satisfy necessities for an individual, and because she assumes that the affluent are genuinely disinterested in people earning less money than themselves.
As an initial matter, by choosing a statistical model which is based on a single parent with two children, Ehrenheich excludes millions and millions of Americans. She does not explain why this statistical model is chosen. She does not explain whether this model is the dominant demographic reality in America. In short, the reader is left to wonder whether this model has any overall relevance, or whether the author is choosing a statistical context most conducive to her own personal preferences. There is an issue of credibility. Is the author, for instance, appealing to the sympathy vote from single parents in order to prove her alleged state of emergency Does this emotive appeal supersede the broader demographic and statistical realities of working people in America The essay, in the final analysis, is flawed from the beginning; it is flawed, to be sure, because the author relies upon a statistical model which excludes Americans rather than includes people. There is no proffered justification for this type of analytical framework.
In addition, r