StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Liability for an Employees Assaults - Case Study Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Liability for an Employees Assaults

The discussion that follows explains why.
Vicarious liability is a legal concept assigning responsibility to an employer for the negligence or prohibited conduct of an employee acting in the course of his duties at work. If the conduct is in no way connected to the employment the employer will not be held liable. There are several reasons for the doctrine of vicarious liability and Michael A. Jones offers perhaps the best synopsis. Jones explains that vicarious liability can be justified on the following grounds:
"(1) The master has the 'deepest pockets'. The wealth of a defendant, or the fact that he has access to resources via insurance, has in some cases had an unconscious influence on the development of legal principles.
The courts have established and developed a three tier test in order to determine whether or not the tortfeasor is an employee and his employer is vicariously liable for the conduct of his or her employee. The three tier tests are: "the control test"2, "the integral test"3and "the multiple test."4
The control test is satisfied if the employee is under the control of the employer. For instance if the employer can terminate the employee for failing to carry out the employer's instructions, the employee is under the control of the employer. ...
likely to be considered an employee and if the employer is at liberty to hire the employee and to terminate his services he will in all likelihood be deemed an employee within the context of the control test.5 Margaret Simpson should have no difficulty establishing the control test for the purpose of having Tom deemed an employee of AFS. He himself stated that he was "only doing his job." Moreover in attempting to justify his conduct he stated that he was responding to comments about his poor performance made by his manager Sarah Harper. This statement is a manifestation of the control Tom's employers had over the manner in which he performed his duties. There were also previous talks about job losses and performance targets which would suggest that Tom was an employee under the control of AFS.
By virtue of the integral test, if the employee forms an integral part of the business and is not merely incidental to the business then he will be deemed an employee.6 Tom Barnes is employed at AFS' headquarters in the position of product sales executive. AFS as a financial services business and selling its products can not in any way be viewed as merely incidental to the success of the business. Therefore it is fair to assume that Tom Barnes, a product sales executive is an integral part of the business.
The multiple test is an amalgamation of the control and integral tests. In Ready Mix Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions (1968) 2 QB 497 it was held that the multiple test is satisfied and an employee is said to be under a contract of service if he is paid for his services, is under the control either expressly or implicitly of his employer and if there are other terms and conditions reflective with an employment contract.7
On the facts of the case for ...Show more

Summary

In general employers are vicariously liable for the torts of their employees provided the tort is committed in the course of employment. Employers are not usually liable for damages in respect of the criminal conduct of their employees, unless an employee performs his duties in a criminal manner…
Author : kerlukeeula
Liability for an Employees Assaults essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Liability for an Employees Assaults"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Civil Liability and Self-Defence
While there was physical injury or battery, I will not counsel Bill to file a criminal action against Alex because there was no malicious intent on the part of the latter when she hit Bill albeit Alex is still civilly liable under the principles of the law on torts.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
Capital Gains Tax Liability
First of all, you own 50% of your property. This is equity. With equity you can do many things, such as make purchases against your equity. The fact that you have a house on the beach in Marmion also helps you in the sense that you completely own (jointly, I might add) a residence.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Criminal law: liability for manslaughter
This results in Fern falling to the pavement and hitting her head, causing an injury from which she dies 2 weeks later. In this paper I will identify the type of offences applicable to both cases; at the same time I will define what the offences are, and explain them with respected to the law, while indicating how the law applies in this case.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Consider Criminal Liability
(Cartwright, 1999, p. 84) John according to the s1 Theft Act 1968 is found guilty of theft as he is depriving others from their property and particularly in the case where he steal 'roses' from one of his neighbours he is purely acting dishonestly depriving the roses from his real property owner.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Liability of Employers and Occupiers
For one to be held responsible for violation of the tort law, the claimant must establish that there is a duty of care and this duty has been breached to cause damage or loss to the claimant that needs to be compensated by an award of damages. There is a breach of the duty of care principle if the defendant is proven to have failed to do what a reasonable person will do in the situation presented (Polinsky & Shavell, 1994).
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Criminal Liability
in the form of some verbal or written confession to the fact, then the possibility of manslaughter arises. There is also the legal duty to act because of an actual or implied contract. For example, in R. v. Pitwood (1902) a defendant was convicted of manslaughter after he failed to close a level crossing gate with the result of a hay cart and a train colliding.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Occupational Safety & Liability
The author of this paper explains that based on the facts of the case, a safe workplace was described as conforming to an injury free workplace. Workplace safety was defined as “the working environment at a company and encompasses all factors that impact the safety, health, and well-being of employees.
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Liability & Negligence
The seller or distributer of the aircraft would also have been liable for the pilot’s accident. Lastly, the insurer of the aircraft can also be found liable for the pilot’s
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Employers Liability for its Employees Sex Abuse Case
Therefore, it is irrelevant that the employer or the principal did not actually inflict the loss sustained by the third party (Grace & Vella, 2000). The legal provisions applicable to this case in determination of whether the employer is liable are
5 pages (1250 words) Case Study
Female Employees
In ‘Women: Keeping the Supply Lines Open,’ there is a report about female employees. Apart from analyzing the agonies of women employees, it provides recommendations on how the management can help in improving the welfare of female employees and motivate them to serve the organization even after quitting and deciding to re-enter once more.
2 pages (500 words) Case Study
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation