StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Roles and responsibilities of chairman of board of directors - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Roles and Responsibilities of Chairman of Board of Directors (BOD):The chairman's role includes managing the board's business and acting as its facilitator and guide. This would involve: •managing the business of the Board and preside over its meetings; …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Roles and responsibilities of chairman of board of directors
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Roles and responsibilities of chairman of board of directors"

a) Roles and Responsibilities of Chairman of Board of Directors (BOD The chairman's role includes managing the board's business and acting asits facilitator and guide. This would involve: managing the business of the Board and preside over its meetings; setting Board meeting agendas, taking full account of the issues and the concerns of all Board members; ensuring that members of the Board receive accurate, timely and clear information, in particular about the Company's performance, to enable effective performance of their duties; monitoring progress towards the timely and effective achievement and implementation of the objectives, policies and strategies set by the Board and of other decisions taken by or on behalf of the Board; facilitating the effective contribution of non- executive directors and ensure constructive relationships and open communication, both between non- executive directors and executive directors and between the Board and investors; ensuring that members of the Board understand the views of major shareholders and other key stakeholders; promoting the highest standards of corporate governance; managing the Board's time to ensure that sufficient time is allowed for discussion of complex or contentious matters; ensuring that new directors receive an induction programme that is tailored and comprehensive; monitoring and addressing the development needs of individual directors and of the Board as a whole and ensure that the performance of individual directors and of the Board and its committees are evaluated at least once a year; establishing a constructive relationship with the Chief Executive Officer , providing support and guidance while respecting executive responsibility Leading the ongoing monitoring and annual evaluation of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. (b) Benefits of separating the roles of chairman and chief executive: The Chairman is a non executive director while the CEO serves as an employee of the company. The benefits of separating their roles are as follows: Separating the roles of chairman and CEO mainly helps in distributing the balance of power and responsibilities. Board is the primary internal control mechanism for aligning the different interests of shareholders and top management. When an individual serves simultaneously as chairman and CEO, the Board's control over him will be weakened. This does not happen when the roles are separated. The role of Chairman includes managing the business of the Board and monitoring its progress. Non-segregation of duties of Chairman and CEO would reduce the monitoring effectiveness over the management of the company. Opportunistic executives may take advantage of their combined role as Chairman and CEO in order to personally benefit at the expense of the shareholders. The chances of such injustice would reduce to an extent if the roles are separated. However, segregation of roles of Chairman and CEO could give rise to certain issues such as: When the roles are segregated, conflicts between the Chairman and CEO may become common if there is lack of goal congruence. Having a single leader instead of two helps promote effective action by the CEO speeding up response to external events faced by the company. Separation of roles could lead to delays in such response. (2) (i) Theoretical Ex-Right Price (TERP): TERP = [(Number of rights required to buy one new share X Market price before rights issue) + Subscription price] / (Number of rights required to buy one new share + 1) = [(4 x 20) + 15] / (4+1) = 19 Number of shares to be issued in the rights issue = 100 million / 15 = 6,666,667 shares (ii) Value at which the rights are likely to be traded: Value of rights = (Market price of common stock - Subscription Price) / (Number of rights required to purchase one of the new shares of common stock) = (20 - 15) / 4 = 1.25 (iii) Evaluation of the three options: Option 1: Profit that can be earned by Apple Insurance Plc if it takes up the rights: (a) Theoretical ex-right price per share 19 (b) Total Number of shares held by Apple Insurance Plc 100,000 (c) Number of shares subscribed for under rights issue (b / 4) 25,000 Theoretical ex-right price of rights shares (a x c) 475,000 Less: Cost to subscribe for rights shares (c x 15) 375,000 Profit 100,000 Option 2: Profit on selling the rights = 25,000 x 1.25 = 31,250 Option 3: Profit on not taking any action = 25,000 x (20 - 15) = 125,000 It would be advisable for Apple Insurance Plc to choose option 3 since the profit it would earn under option 3 is the highest. (iv) The main reason for any company to issue its rights shares at a discount is to make the offer relatively attractive to shareholders and encourage them either to take up their rights or sell them so the share issue is "fully subscribed". The price discount also acts as a safeguard should the market price of the company's shares fall before the issue is completed. The existing shareholders or purchaser of rights would still be interested in subscribing for the shares so far as the subscription price remains lower than the market price of the shares. A company would prefer to use rights issue as a source of finance because the chances of the shares being fully subscribed under rights issue is higher when compared to shares being freshly issued in the market. (3) (a) Circumstances under which a financial manager may need to value a company: i. One of the most common reasons for valuing a business is for sale/purchase purpose. Valuation acts as a starting point for negotiations during such transaction. ii. Valuation would be required to resolve bankruptcy related matters. iii. Valuing a business can also help motivate staff and provide them incentive. For example, it can be extended to share valuations for entry into an employee share option scheme. iv. Regular valuations provide measurement criteria for management in order to help them evaluate how the business is performing. (b) Distinction between organic (internal) growth methods of business expansion and Mergers and Acquisition (external): A firm can grow in two ways: either by merging with or acquiring other firms (external growth), or by increasing its own assets or output through the reinvestment of its cash flows in existing businesses (internal growth). Organic (Internal) growth refers to business expansion or the growth rate that a company can achieve by increasing its output, sales or both. It involves utilization of internal resources of the company. On the other hand, profits from takeovers, mergers and acquisitions are not generated within the company. It involves acquisition of or merger with resources of another business. Organic growth is growth that comes from a company's existing businesses, as opposed to external growth that comes from buying new businesses. Organic growth includes growth over a period that results from investment in businesses the company owned at the beginning of the period, but excludes the boost to growth resulting from acquisitions, and the decline from sales and closures of whole businesses. Organic growth represents the true growth for the core of the company. It is a good indicator of how well management has used its internal resources to expand profits. Organic growth also identifies whether managers have used their skills to improve the business. Both types of growth strategies are regularly used simultaneously, and have advantages and drawbacks. External growth creates synergies and market power, but it can also destroy value if the management reinvests the firm's resources or free cash flows in inefficient projects for their own personal interest. On the other hand, internal growth provides more corporate control, encourages internal entrepreneurship, and protects organisational culture, but it often is a slower way of growth compared to Mergers and Acquisitions since it requires the development of new resources internally. (c) Computation of value of shares of Owens plc to Steel plc: (in millions) (in millions) Assets: Land & Buildings 23.00 Plant & Machinery 10.50 Fixtures & Fittings 1.20 Motor Vehicles 3.00 Stocks 8.50 Debtors 8.55 Prepayments 1.50 Total Assets 56.25 Less: Liabilities Creditors 4.40 Taxation 1.00 Bank Overdraft 0.60 12% Debentures 5.00 Deferred Tax 1.00 Total Liabilities 12.00 (a) Net Assets 44.25 (b) Number of Outstanding Shares (in millions) 9.80 Value per share () [a / b] 4.51 Therefore, the value to Steel plc of each ordinary share in Owens plc would be 4.51 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Roles and responsibilities of chairman of board of directors Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1507394-roles-and-responsibilities-of-chairman-of-board-of-directors
(Roles and Responsibilities of Chairman of Board of Directors Essay)
https://studentshare.org/management/1507394-roles-and-responsibilities-of-chairman-of-board-of-directors.
“Roles and Responsibilities of Chairman of Board of Directors Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1507394-roles-and-responsibilities-of-chairman-of-board-of-directors.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Roles and responsibilities of chairman of board of directors

Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements Vary Widely from Country to Country

In so doing, explain the extent to which decision rights and appointment rights (selection and removal of directors) differ across jurisdictions.... As per OECD, managerial accountability elucidates governance responsibilities and roles and to make sure that shareholder's interest and managerial interest are lined up and supervised by the board of directors3.... To evaluate the managerial accountability, it is necessary to assess the individual performance periodically whether it is the individual director, CEO, the outside auditor, the entire board or its officers and...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

UK Corporate Governance Law

The board should explain to the shareholders, either in the report or separately by setting up a company website, the different roles and responsibilities of the remuneration, nomination, and auditing committees, and their references; the grounds for the nomination and selection of the various directors; the evaluation process, and the grounds for selection of the external evaluator, and his connection with the company; and when a remuneration consultant is recruited, the reasons for such service, and the connection between the company and the consultant (FRC 2010: 32)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Non-Executive Directors in the Corporate Governance Process

hellip; This entails the inclusion of Non-executive Directors or NEDs in the company board of directors in the process of promoting good corporate governance.... They are also required in the board of directors of Company's as mandated by the UK Corporate Governance Code stating that “The board should include an appropriate combination of executive and non-executive directors (and, in particular, independent non-executive directors) such that no individual or small group of individuals can dominate the board's decision taking (2010: 12 Their difference lies in the duties and responsibilities that they perform whereby the non-executive directors desist from getting involve in the regular operation of the business but rather facilitates the board as it craft the strategic direction of the company....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Dual Leadership in UK Organizations

Shareholder activists and regulators maintain that US firms should separate the titles of CEO and chairman of the Board as separate titles could reduce agency costs incorporation and improve performance.... There are controversies to this sort of responsibility as when the responsibilities of the CEO and Chairman are given to one person, there can be a decrease of vigilance and flaws in accountability and operations of the company.... hellip; The UK companies separating the role of the CEO and the Chairman could be studied as the CEO runs the company and the Chairman runs the board....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Structured Corporate Governance Principles in Case of Corporate Failures

The code highlights on performance evaluation and regular monitoring and emphasises on the performance evaluation of board members and the committees and executive directors (Combined Code, 2003; Directors' Remuneration Report, 2002).... It also lays down the rule that the role of chairman and chief executive should not be a position taken by the same person (in Combined Code, 2003).... The two independent review reports - the Higgs Report on Non-Executive directors and the Smith Report on Audit Committees, were published in January 2003 and form the bases for the revised Code [also see Higgs review (2003) and Smith review (2003)]....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Important Management Functions

It lists the roles and responsibilities of the chairman of the board of directors, benefits of separating the roles of chairman and chief executive, circumstances under which a financial manager may need to value a company.... Separating the roles of chairman and CEO mainly helps in distributing the balance of power and responsibilities.... he role of chairman includes managing the business of the Board and monitoring its progress.... Non-segregation of duties of chairman and CEO would reduce the monitoring effectiveness over the management of the company....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Non-executive Directors and Fulfilling the Role Given to Them in the UK Corporate Governance Code

Essentially the role of a non executive director is to provide creative contribution to the board of directors of a particular company.... As part of the board of a specific company non executive directors should manage to bring: independence in their view of how the operations are run in the company, impartiality, wide experience in the activities a company undertakes and personal qualities that will add positive value in the company.... The governance code of the UK which is related to corporate is a set of standards of good practice in relation to board of director's leadership and effectiveness, remuneration, degree of accountability and its relations to the shareholders....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Company Law UK: Non-Executive Directors and the Combined Code 2008

nbsp;… The link between good governance and enforcement of Combined Code 2008 could be seen in terms of the fact that if the Chairman and his board of directors need to offer full support and co-operation to Nonexecutive directors in the performance of their onerous tasks in coordination and cooperation with the other senior management.... nbsp; According to the Companies Act 1985 and also the new Companies Act 2006, there has been no definition of NED as such, and a lot about duties and responsibilities of NED would vest with the roles they perform....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us