The last two decades have witnessed major changes in the migration to European countries. There have been new destinations and new regions of origin for the people to think of migration. This has made most of the traditional models of migration not only inadequate but also out of date…
The flows for the non-European region led to a large scale migration to Europe. The increased restrictions on immigration policies have resulted in the increased flow of non-conventional and illegal migrants in to the European nations. The involvement of European Union in the migration policies of the individual member nations has increasingly become necessary and further enlargement in the European Union territory has accentuated this necessity. The flows of migration in both directions have resulted in some major impact on the economies of the host countries in the EU. This paper analyzes the possible effects of the migration as to whether the mass migration results in some benefit or it should be construed as a threat to the nations.
People migrate from one country or region to another for their own benefits which may include getting a better pay, joining the spouse of parent, to obtain more welfare benefits or for security reasons. Most of the host nations receiving these migrants stand to benefit. For instance, the demand for labour may be met easily when imported from other countries. On some other occasions the same country may export labour to other countries depending on the economic cycle the country is undergoing and due to the differences in the economies of different countries and labour markets. However whether the mass migration to another country really benefits the people in the host country is a matter of circumstance prevailing in the host nation. It may be noted that all the international migrants in the recent past to the United States and European Union represent spouses, dependants, relatives, students, asylum claimants for whom there is absolutely no demand in these countries. In any case they do not represent labour migrants. Apart from these there are other illegal and short term migrants who would like to stay and improve their position by any available avenues. Over the period the economic benefits of labour migration have become less significant and have even turned negative (Borjas 1996, Wardensjo, 1999).
Argument for Economic Interests of Business
The first argument that will be put forth in favour of mass migration is the economic criteria involving business interests. However this argument suffers from a lacuna that the business interests that favour mass migration inwards into a country is always of short term nature. Although easy and immediate access to labor will be preferred rather than the costs involve in training and capital investment for long term, the nature of economic cycle would make the labour which was essential yesterday totally unemployed today, as has been witnessed with most the factories and mills of Europe. Employers who demand more of immigrant labour could not be blamed for the changed scenario. If the businesses are made responsible for the dealing the with the life time cost of these labour immigrants they would obviously reduce their demand for immigrant labour and make long term capital investment. However it must be remembered that the countries can not be just treated as just a set of economic levers but they consist of communities of people who have their own shared values, commitments, identities, origins and aspirations all of which will be affected by mass migration of people.
Argument for General Economic Interest
Cite this document
(“Is mass migration more of a threat or a benefit to European host Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/281505-is-mass-migration-more-of-a-threat-or-a-benefit-to-european-host-countries
(Is Mass Migration More of a Threat or a Benefit to European Host Essay)
“Is Mass Migration More of a Threat or a Benefit to European Host Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/281505-is-mass-migration-more-of-a-threat-or-a-benefit-to-european-host-countries.
Mass migration is a social phenomenon related to the radical changes on a country’s economic and social life – as a result of rapid technological and economic growth but also because of the influence of similar social trends worldwide.
Apart from the increase in the capital stock, host countries benefit from management skills. These effects have a direct impact on the economic growth of the countries (Dunning and Lundan, 2008). Foreign firms also increase employment in these countries. However, the inflow of FDI has negative impacts such as reducing the sovereignty of a host country.
Name: Tutor: Course: Date: University: What impact does migration have on European politics? Introduction Over the years, Europe has witnessed an increase in population, which has resulted from migration. in London, statistics indicate that Britons who are white have reduced by 45 percent due to this migration.
Impact of migration on European politics.
European politics has been dominated by immigration. Political parties jostling for power have used immigration as a voter enticing card. At the center of all this is citizenship to immigrants. Immigrants move to Europe with the aim of obtaining citizenship whereas in the early 1990’s they just wanted to be safe and free.
Globalisation can be defined as “to the intensification of global interconnectedness, suggesting a world full of movement and mixture, contact and linkages, and persistent cultural interaction and exchange. It speaks, in other words, to the complex mobilities and interconnections that characterize the globe today” (p. 329).
Freedom of movement of labour is seen as a benefit of integration, and takes the form of a legal provision which gives an opportunity for individuals to look for employment in the EU. Whether or not they are employed depends on the labour market situation in the EU and the decision of individual employers.
To underscore this, one need only look at the Arab countries and their failure to even achieve a shallow form of integration, not even a deep one, despite shared language, culture and several centuries of history. Furthermore, the European Union, from its earliest roots as a steel and mining trading unit between a limited numbers of countries, seems to be in a constant process of evolution and development.
The background to enlargement is explained in the first section. The reasons for supporting this policy position are explained in the next section. The recommendations for the future course of action for the EC are given in the last section.
2.1 The European Union started as a six nation economic community in 1958.
According to the report the background to enlargement is explained in the first section. The reasons for supporting this policy position are explained in the next section. The recommendations for the future course of action for the EC are given in the last section. The European Union started as a six nation economic community in 1958.
countries for which this model of development has become a fait accompli today demonstrate a high level of competitiveness of their economies, allowing them to maintain strong positions in global markets technology products and services and receive huge income.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is mass migration more of a threat or a benefit to European host countries for FREE!