The Workplace relations Amendment Act 2005 is one of the landmark legislations within the Australian industrial relation sector for over one hundred years now. It was passed in 2005 and implemented in 2006. The purpose of the bill was to make sure that workers could secure their jobs; this would serve as a platform for economic progress within Australia…
(Parliament of Australia, 2006)
The bill has caused strong reactions from numerous stakeholders. A substantial number of employer association affirmed their support for the Bill. However, there are also some trade unions and labor associations that strongly campaigned against the Act. Some of these groups oppose the way the Bill was passed in parliament; they feel that most of them were not adequately informed about it. These arguments were brought forward by opposition members of parliament who argued that members of the Liberal National Coalition did not give the Bill enough time. However, there are intentions to change many parts of the Work Choices legislation as asserted by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. He represents the Labor party which may have won the election due to this issue.
Numerous opposition parliamentarians were opposed to the legislation. This affected the way the matter was handled in parliament. These opposition members; who represented the Labor party, claimed that there were inadequate copies of the Bill. Consequently, they took part in numerous campaigns against the Bill on the day it was introduced. Matters became more heated when parliamentarians were required to question the Bill; Labor party members were seen interrupting remarks made by proponents of the Bill and a substantial number had to be removed from the House. ...
This was quite a hurried arrangement. As if that was not enough, the Bill was passed exactly a month after it had been introduced. Minister at that time argued that the hurried response was to avoid introduction of the legislation during an election year. However, this undermined the need for consensus. In order for pieces of legislation to gain acceptance by the public, they need to be thoroughly scrutinized. When this is not done effectively, some problems may arise in the future especially during implementation.
The role of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC)
The AIRC has been in charge of unfair dismissals and terminations too. However, the enactment of the Work Choices legislation has reduced their efforts in this regard. For example, employees who wish to make a claim to the Commission about unfair dismissals are expected to do so within a period of twenty one days fork the time their employment was terminated. This means that employees are placed at a disadvantage because twenty one days are not enough. In light of this, the legislation places more power in the hands of the employer rather than the employee since most of them may not be bale to meet this new deadline.
The Australian Industrial Relations Commission is expected to approve extensions of claim periods. However, it has been shown that most of the time, these extensions are rarely granted. Part of the reason for this could be that there is a fee for application and most employees may not be able to afford this. Another reason for this observation could be the long procedures that employees have to pass through before they are granted extensions. The Work Relations Amendment has created long procedures; ...
Cite this document
(“The Workplace Relations Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/281847-the-workplace-relations-amendment
(The Workplace Relations Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words)
“The Workplace Relations Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/281847-the-workplace-relations-amendment.
Employee Rights to Privacy at the Workplace. Advancement in technology has brought about several inventions that can both make or break an organization in terms of productivity. Like the over-intended use of any invention has negative impact, the same goes for the work place savvy technology that is in place for faster and more efficient transfer of information and messages.
The workplace is where most adults spend roughly half of their waking hours. It is not surprising, therefore, that employment practices affect a broad range of privacy rights. Employers have a great deal of leeway in collecting data on their employees, regulating access to personnel files, and disclosing file contents to outsiders.
Why is it so What is the psychological mindset of people that allows them to give one gender more than the other How does it affect the women in the corporate world What are the problems faced by women today and how do they fight to survive in this male dominant world
The new legislations envisaged a radical shift in the workplace relationships. It introduced a commission to monitor fair pay, perks and service conditions to the employees through separate work place agreements between the employer and the employees. Reviewed the award system mired in bureaucracy and simplified the procedures.
As it stands, the unions in Australia are facing more and more limitations on their access to workplaces and the once compulsory conciliation and arbitration is being dismantled as the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) loses its once mighty powers.
In Australia, conciliation and arbitration remained protected by the constitution; however, industrial relations reforms aimed at severely weakening the system were implemented in the 1990s. According to Wooden (1999) the collective bargaining coverage has dropped.
It is an employee's performance in the workplace that gets the job done and ensures productivity. Australian Prime Minister John Howard has called for a conscious change in the workplace relations. Vigorous governmental action and national cooperation is expected for the achievement of a common purpose of implementing effective reforms that promote a higher level of growth and performance.
A recent study found that over 130 million workers send 2.8 billion e-mail messages daily.1 The fact is that technological advancement and dependence of these technologies provide unprecedented efficiency to the workplace.
Forcing workers to work by intimidation or any other means will result to them using other tactics to have their demand met. To avoid the inconveniences of strikes and lock outs the employer should come to a binding arbitration with the