It seems to be that the most memorable aspect of the Cold War which lasted roughly from the time that Hitler fell in 1945 at the end of the Second World War to its end in the seventies is that America earned the status of world super power and the once indomitable Soviet Union was fragmented…
But was the defeat of the Soviet Union the only thing that happened during the Cold War' There is more to this story from which America emerged smelling like a rose and putting itself on the pedestal of world redeemer; after all, it had been the nation instrumental in freeing the world from the clutches of Hitler and then afterwards, barely snatching the world from Russia's snapping communist jaws. Who really paid the price of victory' It was the defenseless and even back then, marginalized third world countries which, depending on what kind of resources that the U.S could draw from them, controlled with the skill of a master puppeteer. This was mostly done by putting into place right wing dictatorial leaders who would ensure that these mostly new democracies would not be lured into communism and gang up with the Soviet Union against the U.S. The end results were disastrous to say the least, and it was these broken countries that were left behind to pick the pieces as America stood on an international podium to receive accolades for her victory.
It is no secret that with the abolition of slave trade in the late 1800s the little interest that the United States had in Africa simply petered out. The colonialists had divided the continent into territories that they claimed for themselves and ran ragged as they chose. America, being an anti-colonialism nation, disapproved from a distance but did not step in to intervene. However, after the Second World War and with the rise of the Cold War, America's interest in African states was on full alert1.
America had this fixed perception of African countries and other third world countries as not being ready for their own democracy. She saw African countries as being too primitive and backwards for self governance. The U.S believed that African countries had to be guided into self governance as it was something completely beyond their comprehension. This resulted in years of U.S meddling with African affairs that has persisted to date.
Why the United States suddenly took an interest in the affairs of African nations is because they believed that these nations were not ready for independence. The United States was afraid that the freshly independent nations, who had such limited experience of democracy, would be exposed to communism and that they would embrace it instead of capitalism. But the U.S could not afford to have an Africa aligned to the Soviet Union; hence they became active in African affairs because now they had a vested interest.
The only way to avert such an eventuality was by determining what kind of governments that there would be in these 'unstable' African nations. The kind of governments that the U.S preferred were the authoritarian types which were not tailored on true democracy. Such governments would ensure that the people stayed in line and could feed propaganda to the masses as they deemed fit.
The U.S took it upon itself to not only tell African states how to govern themselves but also chose African leaders who she felt would forward her own agendas. Right from the ...
Cite this document
(“Cold War conflict Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/283543-cold-war-conflict
(Cold War Conflict Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Cold War Conflict Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/283543-cold-war-conflict.
The Effects of the Cold War on the Middle East. If the Cold War is deemed as the communism’s conflict with the capitalist west under the headship of the United States, communism decidedly becomes defeated. The Soviet leadership’s expansionist desire to force communism upon the rest of the earth panicked the wealthy capitalist west whose reaction to the communist expansionism eventually kindled the war.
He used that term in the context of how world at that time was under the threat of nuclear warfare, and so how there may be “peace that is no peace”, calling it the permanent “cold war”. In the same context, he directly referred to that Cold War as a kind of ideological conflict that was happening between the Soviet Union and other Western countries.
The cold war witnessed ideological and geo-territorial struggles between the United States and the Soviet Union, which contributed to stability and peace in Africa because of their political and economic presence in the continent. The absence of ideological and geo-territorial struggles between major powers in the African continent brought to fore major socioeconomic and political problems, which have sparked many civil conflicts2.
Similarly, those countries that were allied to the United States also depended on this same stance on communism. Therefore, the foreign policy of the United States today can be considered to have lost important guiding principles.
In this scenario, Russian intervention in the Middle East problem, even though not yet a thing of the past, has lost much of its teeth, and may be much of its voice too. And USA, the ‘lone super power’ reigns supreme.
The author of this essay gives a definition of the Cold War. He assumes that the Cold War can be defined as the conflicts of interests between the two superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, in the post Second World War period. It existed from 1947 to 1991. In the end the author makes an analytical conclusion.
It is apparent that our social and economic policies are ideally different, and as much as we intend to advance the benefits presented by a communist approach, the USA is equally willing to further their capitalist ideologies and overtake us in advancing capitalism. In my opinion, the country needs to change its approach towards new rebellions.
For many countries the mass destruction caused by advancement in weapons was their major issue. Developing from the Second World War tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States that lasted for
Despite their collaboration to defeat a common enemy, Japan, their engagement in the war, just masked the contempt they had for each other. Economic competition and political conflict characterized the Cold War, even
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Cold War conflict for FREE!