Overall, this paper shows many good decisions that were made in how to present the information. Good structure was used to help present the information in a precise and correct format, with a few problems here and there in the presentation of the information.
The writer also includes how long he has been working on the report, a testament to how much work he has truly put in.
The first problem I notice with the report starts right after the introduction. The writer starts by dividing the report into three sections, but then lists off 16 bullets. While not a huge problem, structurally it looks out of place, but takes away very little in the overall scheme of the report. Something that still should be fixed however.
The description part of the project is laid out nicely, divided into separate sections, all set apart by the appropriate headings. Making these headings bold has also made it so they stick out, and also adds a little more efficiency to the lay out of the report.
By listing the different topics of the report, the writer has been able to show how much work he has completed on each subject. He shows how he has completed the first topic of the subject, the computer science part. He then goes on to scientifically explain the different components making up that part of the report. He then also offers the ideas of what work he has left on this subject, showing that while much of his work on this section is completed, he still has some fine tuning to do.
I also really like how he divides the different sections, making the transitions between the different sections definite, and also something even using a thin line to define the start and ending of the different sections.
For the next topic, ...