Criminal law: liability for manslaughter

Masters
Case Study
Miscellaneous
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 0
(A) Fern and Joe are out in the local town, visiting the shops. Fern repeatedly runs into the road and is in danger of being hit by vehicles. Joe warns her of the danger and repeatedly tells her not to do this. Finally, Joe loses his temper and hits* Fern…

Introduction


In case A we have to deal with an offence. The offence is about Joe, Fern's father, who loses his temper over Fern not listening about the danger of being hit by the vehicles and pushes Fern. She hurts herself and dies.
An offence, according to the law regulations is a "violation of the penal law" where penal law or criminal law is "the body of laws that are enforced by the State in its own name and impose penalties for their violation." Usually an offence can be either a traffic violation which would represent a misdemeanor or a capital murder which would represent a fellow. However, an offence is different from a crime in the fact that there's no typical victim, by "the action remains prohibited by statute."
Nevertheless, in case A we are dealing with an offence called involuntary manslaughter. The reason is because in UK this is called "gross negligence" manslaughter because the intention was not to kill the victim; the result of the Fern's death, even thought was caused by being used and hurting her head, it is a case of death that resulted from "recklessness or criminal negligence."
In the UK the liability for manslaughter due to recklessness is also defined as "wanton blinded ness" in which the culpable person refuses t be aware of the dangers of a particular situation. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Criminal law: liability for manslaughter
In case A we have to deal with an offence. The offence is about Joe, Fern's father, who loses his temper over Fern not listening about the danger of being hit by the vehicles and pushes Fern. She hurts herself and dies.…
LL1014 CRIMINAL LAW I
Law tells us what is right, while ethics is not so categorical and definite in its approach. The opinion was also supported by Maitland in connection to the British law(Pollock and Maitland, History of English law, vol.2). Miller defines crime " to be the commission or the omission of an act which the law forbids or commands under pain of a punishment to be imposed by the state by a proceeding in…
LL1014C CRIMINAL LAW I
Murder is the specific intent crime and manslaughter is the basic intent crime. If he does not convicted under murder then he will be charged under constructive manslaughter. A person will be liable for murder if he unlawfully killing a reasonable person who is in being under the Queen's Peace with intention to kill [Moloney1, Cunningham 2, Vickers 3] or intention to cause grievous bodily harm…
Criminal Law: problem analysis
It provides that a person is guilty of conspiracy if he agrees with any other person or persons to pursue a course of conduct which if carried out as intended, will necessarily amount to the commission of an offence by one or more of the parties to the agreement or would do so but for the existence of facts which renders the commission of the offences impossible.…
Criminal Law Problem question
The relevant facts in the Kennedy case are substantially similar to the facts in the given problem. In Kennedy, as in the case of Edward, the defendant merely prepared a dose of heroin for the deceased. It was the deceased who self-administered the drug as in Lisa's case. In the Kennedy case, the court ruled that defendant Kennedy cannot be held criminally liable for manslaughter. Applying the…
New Legislation Gives More Teeth to Corporate Manslaughter Law in UK
This used to be the case in UK where organized labor and other concerned sectors had for many years railed against the growing number of deaths at work in which nobody gets the blame and receives the appropriate penalty.…
Criminal Law Liability
There is also the legal duty to act because of an actual or implied contract. For example, in R. v. Pitwood (1902)2 a defendant was convicted of manslaughter after he failed to close a level crossing gate with the result of a hay cart and a train colliding. The collision resulted in the death of a man. Pitwood argued that he had no legal duty to the deceased, but Judge Wright held that he did have…