Gay marriage has become a legalized and socially recognized marriage union between two persons of the same biological gender. This marriage union goes in support of homosexuality, which involves sexual behaviour between organisms of the same sex or gender instead of the natural phenomena of people of opposite sex attracted or involved with each other…
Now, it is being altered by more liberal and modern generation as a union between two people having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage. I believe the former is not an orthodox or conservative view but a meaningful and reasonable implication carrying great weight. My opinion is supported by.
The concept of same-sex marriages simply weakens the definition and respect for the divine institution of marriage. Marriage is not a joke but a life-time commitment and same-sex marriages fail to last longer. It is said that same-sex male couples are more likely to divorce within eight years, and female couples were one hundred sixty-seven times more likely than traditional couples to divorce. It is an unnatural concept and unless a great deal of effort is not put in, it's hard to maintain or stabilize marriage by gay couples. I don't think that homosexuality is an inborn trait, but a chosen behaviour that does not deserve special protection under the law. Biologically speaking, it makes sense that only a man and woman can procreate.
When looked at from a religious point of view, homosexuality is considered as a sin and so are same-sex marriages. In Islam, homosexuality is the most looked upon and disgraceful conduct in the eyes of Allah. This is proved in the Holy book of Quran, which is a foremost foundation of Islamic law. The people of Hazrat Loot (prophet of God) practised the act of sodomy shamelessly. Allah punished them for their perverted act. Angel Hazrat Jibra'eel lifted their entire city into the sky, inverted them and brought them crashing down onto earth upside down, boulders and rocks rained down upon them from the sky crushing them to non existence. "We also (sent) Loot: he said to his people: "Do you commit immorality such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you For you practise your lusts on men in preference to women: you are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds." (Surah al- Araf, 7/80-84). "That He did create in pairs- male and female, (The Noble Quran, 53:45)"
The Bible also condemns same-sex marriages. In Leviticus 18:22, the LORD commands not to be a gay. "'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable" ( New International Version) "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination" (American Standard Bible). In Leviticus, the Bible commands to kill the gay!
Gay-marriages can have deleterious effects on children and family structures. Children will be born confused having no good role models in the form of parents. They will either have two mothers or two fathers. The parents will have difficulty in fulfilling the duties of both father and mother required for decent upbringing of children. The culture and values start to crumble, by introducing another form of "family". However, those who advocate gay marriages would oppose this view by saying that is perhaps too early to comment without enough evidence.
This is true that anyone can have a blessing like children, like for example infertile couples can even produce through unnatural ways and no government, power or authority can stop them but it is a little different in the case of gay couples. Same-sex marriage couples are more prone to diseases like HIV and AIDS. It has ...
Cite this document
(“Argumentative Essay Why Gay Marriages Should Not Be Permitted”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/286905-argumentative-essay-why-gay-marriages-should-not-be-permitted
(Argumentative Essay Why Gay Marriages Should Not Be Permitted)
“Argumentative Essay Why Gay Marriages Should Not Be Permitted”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/286905-argumentative-essay-why-gay-marriages-should-not-be-permitted.
Though some people are still against gay marriage, there are others that have begun to rally for changes to be made to the portions of the Constitution that alter the way that homosexual couples are treated. States throughout America have made gay marriages legal, but there are still many states that have remained unclear about where they stand.
Truth be told, every argument either for or against has its own sufficient backing in such a complex way that there is a necessity for each state to redefine its stand and interpretation within the context of the federal constitution. Nevertheless, the issue around gay marriages seemed to have been brooding over centuries, seeking to hatch in the twenty first century.
My intention is to support their right to be gay and I think no one has the right to tell them that those belonging to the same sex can’t co-exist as couples. Gay marriage is prohibited in some states, and at the same time some states allows gay marriage.
Opponents of these marriages are hell-bent to ensure that the society maintains the status quo in connection with traditional definition of marriage, which is a union between a man and a woman (Nagle, 2010). On the other hand, proponents have a difficult task to convince the already biased society that marriage is a union, which is dependent on individual feelings, such as love, and therefore it is the best time that the society re-examined its stand on the admissibility of homosexuality as an influential advancement in the institution of marriage.
This means that even couples that are of the same gender; gays and lesbians, should be able to enjoy these benefits even outside their heterosexual unions .while most people define marriage as an institution that is characterized by a union between man and woman, with an aim of childrearing and child bearing.
Through a detailed analysis surrounding the grounds by which homosexual marriages should not be permitted, an examination of homosexuality and its oppositional arguments will be established by focusing on homosexuality as a sin, weakened traditional family values, and the misrepresentation of marital benefits.
According to the report the confluence of social and political forces around the release of Jim de Seve's documentary "Tying the Knot" gives the film a topicality that could not have been predicted. The film opens with rare footage of a 1971 demonstration by the Gay Activist Alliance, which took over the New York City Marriage License Bureau to protest the exclusion of same-sex couples.
Gay rights include ceremonial marriages, child adoption, domestic partnership registration on public record, domestic partnership affidavit given by employers to gay employees that defines the couple’s economic relationship, health care,
But the point of concern is on whether or not this social right issue is a nationwide concern. Looking at it from a gendered perspective, it may be termed gender equality right campaign because it affects people of a specific “gender”, that is same sex oriented couples and therefore, it is not necessarily a nationwide issue.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Argumentative Essay Why Gay Marriages Should Not Be Permitted for FREE!