StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu
  • Home
  • Subjects
  • Miscellaneous
  • How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories

How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories

To his mind the law was a necessary and rational perversion of nature, part of the civil contract that governed all societies - a compromise in order for men to live peacefully. Grotius, on the other hand, would not accept the separation of nature and the law - the true law arose out of human nature and, more pertinently to him, the nature of God. As such, the law is not merely a series of arbitrary rules with which those in a social group (say, the state) are forced to comply. It is a base for all interaction, including interaction between states. As such Grotius points to a law than can be transnational, one that binds all cultures and societies.
Machiavelli portrayed a system of government that, unlike the systems of government that had been propounded before, was based entirely on pragmatic concerns. In his writings there is a large gap between the concept of things that are morally correct, and those things which are politic and advisable. As he says when regarding the way a leader chooses to rule his people, "it is a sound maxim that reprehensible actions may be justified by their effects" (Brown et al. 266). This, then, completely changes the landscape of how one is to understand the law, which before Machiavelli had been considered the inscription of rules barring those practices which are immoral or against the common good. In other words, people had seen the law as something which was used to protect society from those members of it who wished to harm the rest. The only way the law is a consideration in Machiavelli's philosophy is if the prince needs to pacify the populace and, by doing so, retain control of a kingdom. The rule of law, then, is merely used by the leader as an appeasement to the collective might of the masses. However - Machiavelli is quite clear - the law can be suspended at any time the prince sees fit, and it should offer no protection from the violence he might wish to inflict - "It should be observed here that men should either be caressed or crushed" (Brown et al. 260).
An example that Machiavelli uses is the annexation of Milan by Louis XII and its subsequent loss to Ludovico. When Louis had taken the principality, the people expected certain favours from him but, in actuality, he ruled as a tyrant. This made it nearly impossible for him to hold the Milan when a new attack came from without. "For when the people who had opened the gate to Louis found that they did not receive the benefits they expected, they could not endure the oppressive rule of the new master" (Brown et al. 258). Notice that Machiavelli does not treat the law (and other benefits, such as governmental structures, a wealthy privileged class, etc.) as a result of the organic growth of society. Rather, it is a tactical means of a prince retaining power. Machiavelli does not identify the rule of just law as a prerequisite of the state, quite the opposite, it is one weapon in the arsenal that a ruler might use in order to perpetuate his rule.
As we will soon find, Hobbes sees the law as a treaty between a group of people - a little like a social contract - which grows of necessity when enough people congregate. For Machiavelli, however, the rule of law is applied from above, by the prince or emperor. The rule of law is intrinsic to the ...Show more

Summary

Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius were all thinkers who engaged with different notions of the law and, beyond that, the state which oversaw and administered the law. However, these three thinkers approach the problems of the law - on what basis does the law stand, how should the law be administered, what is the nature of the state when it comes into contact with the law - in widely different ways…
Author : gisselle99
How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

The Theories of Thomas Hobbes
His most famous work that has contributed extensively towards the western political philosophy is his book Leviathan, which was published in 1651. There was a strong background as to why Hobbes decided to get this book published.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Hobbes, Machiavelli and Moral Relativism
The Prince was written as both a philosophy and “how-to” manual for Lorenzo di Medici, scion of the ruling Florentine family with which Macchiavelli is generally associated. Macchiavelli’s seminal work is concerned with the acquisition and maintenance of power, by whatever means are available and necessary.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power
As implied by the connotative meaning of the word "Machiavellian," which suggests a kind of diabolical implementation of cruel and random acts absent rhyme or reason. However, this radically understates the moral and axiological project that informs their work and thinking.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Politics as Violence in Hobbes and Machiavelli
Other theories of renowned authors on the study are therefore relevant to challenge the veracity of both authors' opinions. Freedom has afforded man the chance to exhibit ambiguity in individual tendencies that adequately serves the totalitarian system. With freedom man considers politics as his highest responsibility for his society stressing the significance of moral values and standards.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Thomas Hobbes Views of Human Nature
Though the work is primarily a political treatise, his treatment of politics is of abiding interest to psychology. His book shows a tendency to rationalize human conduct. As a confirmed royalist, his purpose was none other than to justify the absolute power of the ruler.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Analyse & assess how hobbes & locke's views differ on the state of nature, the social contract, and the system of government. To what extent was each philosophe
Their arguments were influenced by their historical experiences. They were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists but beyond this, their views differed on the state of nature, the social contract, and the system of
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Compare the ways philosophers, Machiavelli and Hobbes, DESCRIBE OR JUSTIFY POLITICS-AS-VIOLENCE
Other theories of renowned authors on the study are therefore relevant to challenge the veracity of both authors’ opinions. Freedom has afforded man the chance to exhibit ambiguity in individual
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
How do the views of 'constructivist' theorists about international security differ from those of 'neo-realists''
The world is becoming more and more interdependent and while globalization has both its supporters and detractors, it is here to stay. What explains the global power of neo-liberalism over the last thirty years? Seeking to explore
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
The Theories of Thomas Hobbes
According to the author of the text, Hobbes' most famous work that has contributed extensively towards the western political philosophy is his book Leviathan, which was published in 1651. And the investigation has shown that there was a strong background as to why Hobbes decided to get this book published.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
How the standards for ascertaining the truth differ between the new scientific views of the world and traditional medieval views
All scientists are involved in the same enterprise of trying to explain how the world works. They believe in the scientific process of observation, experimentation and the development and evaluation of explanatory theories (Sherman and Salisbury 440-460).
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation