In order to better understand the system of government that impacts all citizens, it remains beneficial to give closer consideration, to those involved with the formation of it. Every individual may find themselves guided by the best of intentions and the ability to interpret things in their own way, through experience and general understanding…
Each side would feel a certain way, in terms of how the system of government should be handled and what its role would need to be.
Making the argument in favor of the constitution and what it meant, would be Alexander Hamilton. The key to convincing the general populous, remains the dedication to the core argument within the issue and for Hamilton, he would seek to do just that. Hamilton would seek to make his case, through the creation of his work commonly referred to as the Federalist Papers. As for the work itself, "The Federalist Papers, originally written as a series of newspaper editorials intended to persuade New York to ratify the Constitution, remains the most valuable exposition of the political theory underlying the Constitution," (Hamilton, p.60). In order for something to be agreed to, it must first be understood.
The impact of Alexander Hamilton's work would be the ability to clearly define the core issue at the center of document itself. To make known the very thing that would ultimately have lead to the document's creation. First and foremost, Hamilton would make the argument that, in order to maintain a sense of organization within the nation, there must be some form a of guiding force that would keep everything, as well as everyone, together and in working order. In the end, so the government could be held to a stronger degree of regulation and to a higher standard of expectation, in terms of its specific responsibilities.
With regard to the founding fathers view of the current state of the American political system, they would see a system that would have a specific organization to it, would still fall sort of an absolute solid outline. Different interpretations bring about potential changes to be made and that has continued to be the case for many years. Hamilton would further argue that, while there would be those who wished to make light of the imperfections found within the national system, they would in turn fail to step forward and enact the change that would improve the situation that they themselves, would feel required improvement.
Hamilton asserts the following, "..While [opponents of the Constitution] admit that the government of the United States is destitute of energy, they contend against conferring upon it those powers which are requisite to supply that energy," (Hamilton, p. 61). When it comes down to it, Hamilton's views about a league would be appear to be folded within his overall argument in favor of the possession of a document, such as the constitution that would be the primary guiding force of a more productive and succinct system of governing. Discontent would be felt on the part of Hamilton, in terms of viewing those whom he would feel as being reactive, rather than proactive. Such persons that would make an argument for the sake of making it, rather than offering up any form of answer, in regard to a potential solution(s) that would fix whatever issues that would have been present.
As he writes, "There is nothing absurd or impracticable in the idea of a league or alliance between independent nations for certain defined purposes precisely stated in a treaty regulating all the details of time, place, circumstance, and quantity, leaving nothing to further discretion, and depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties," (Hamilton, p. 61-62). ...
Cite this document
(“Alexander Hamiltons The Federalist, No. 15 Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/288883-alexander-hamiltons-the-federalist-no-15
(Alexander Hamiltons The Federalist, No. 15 Essay)
“Alexander Hamiltons The Federalist, No. 15 Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/288883-alexander-hamiltons-the-federalist-no-15.
According to a chart of the library of congress in Washington, it is however claimed that the West coast of America was discovered by Marco Polo two centuries before it was done by Christopher Columbus. Several theories have been reported from the chart of the library which includes the possibility of the discovery of the Northern coast of America in the year 1295, when Marco polo returned to Venice.
Introduction Federalist Papers are considered as the most important source of constitutional history of United States of America and outlined the basic principles based on which the foundations of US were built. Comprising of series of 85 articles, Federalist Papers were mostly published during the period of Oct 1787 & Aug 1788.
This paper is merely going to shed some light on his essay and compare his executive branch with that under the Articles of Confederation which were perceived as producing a weak government only to be replaced by the Constitution later. Hamilton starts off his essay by distinguishing the President of America from the King of Great Britain by stating that the king is a monarch through inheritance whereas the President is elected by his people and stays on his chair for as long as the people want him to serve (Hamilton, 1992).
Hamilton would serve in the Cabinet and become a major force in setting economic policy for the US (The Federalist Papers 1997). Federalist Paper No. 10 is an essay by James Madison and the tenth of the Federalist Papers, a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.
In addition, the papers pointed out the inherent flaws of a Democracy and warned against using its high ideals to achieve a goal the may be unattainable. The Federalist Papers argue for the implementation of the Constitutional form of government that we have today.
As with most Republicans and Democrats, groups that usually have very distinct differences regarding their position on society, finance and business, the Centrist has a more balanced perspective and is able to see the needs of the poor and afflicted as well as supporting the
The Federalist paper chosen is “The Federalist Paper No. 1” by Alexander Hamilton and the Anti-Federalist paper chosen is “The Brutus” by Robert Yates.
If we examine the Federalist paper first, we find that Hamilton was laying out a series
, capable of increasing by means of further associations, till they arrive at such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of the whole body” (www.intellectualtakeout.org, Founders).
It was in 1780s in colonial America when federalism developed a political
James Madison, the writer of Federalist no 10, favours a large, national republic established by the Constitution and governed by a handful of people. The elective representatives would be more patriotic, more refined and enthusiastic in performing their tasks, keeping in mind the people whom they are representing.
In this Federalist Paper #10, Madison talked about the weakness presented by a faction in a government but also presented the strength of the solution. The weakness was the faction inherent in every government and the strength
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Alexander Hamiltons The Federalist, No. 15 for FREE!