The choice to or not to abort should vest with the pregnant woman. The debate arouses virulent passions2.
To being forth the intensity of emotions aroused by the contentious issue of abortion and some semblance of objectivity, viewpoints of a male and female author have been considered. The female is a staunch anti-abortionist, and the male an 'enlightened' believer in freedom of choice. In the interest of simplification, the adherents of divergent viewpoints have been placed in two categories, namely, pro and anti abortionists.
In an article titled, "Abortion rights are pro-life," Dr. Leonard Peikoff3 takes an aggressive stance, and wonders why the pro-abortion rights forces are on the defensive. He willingly provides the answer: because nobody is any longer defending the right to abortion on moral grounds. He exhorts the pro-abortionists not to be apologetic and fight tooth and nail. He believes that "the embryo is clearly pre-human; only the mystical notions of religious dogma treat this clump of cells as constituting a person," and "is not an independently existing, biologically formed organism, let alone a person."
Dr. Peikoff expounds the view that "which lives within the body of another can claim no right against its host. Rights belong only to individuals, not to collectives or to parts of an individual."
He quotes acclaimed litterateur Ayn Rand: "Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born."
Dr. Peikoff argues that denying a woman the right to choose whether to bear a child or not would be a violation of the fundamental principle of freedom.
Anti-abortion: Title, author, and Thesis
Diane S. Dew, a mother and an anti-abortionist campaigner, in an article titled, "It's a child, not a choice," argues that society's penchant for defense of rights of an individual smacks of the diabolical and pro-abortionists have blown it out of proportion. She contends that the pro-abortion lobby is backed by vested interests, notably, doctors, for whom "abortion is big business."
Potential life should not be sacrificed at the altar of convenience.
Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, our nation has lost an entire generation to abortion. We are beginning to see some of the effects of that diabolical decision, as universities nationwide find themselves strapped for students. How many Michaelangelos have we destroyed in the name of convenience How many Edisons have we erased from the pages of human progress4
Dew builds up an anti-abortion case based on her own horrendous experience, wherein she combated terrible odds to bring forth life and now delights in her choice. She forcefully brings out her argument that the pro-abortion lobby should be discredited with the words: "All abortion has to