As there weren't any defined hierarchical structure within the group, so the individual and authoritarian decision making strategy were inapplicable in this situation. It was rather that we used the consensus decision-making model, as all every member of our group is a professional who has his own views on the problem, and who can make valuable contribution to solving it.
Before making a decision we listened for all of the suggestions the members of our group had, and then we took the most valuable from all of the suggestions we heard. At the end of this stage, everything which we decided was worth attention was written down, and than we developed a strategy of actions according to all the information gathered. Thus the result we got was a result of real group work, but without the biases of the groupthink phenomenon.
One of the characteristic features of group decision making process is that a good process itself doesn't guarantee the good outcome, and, on the contrary, complicated decision making process doesn't always result in a bad decision. Group decision making process is much more complicated than the individual one, due to the fact that there are several people in the group whose views have to be considered when making a decision.
The success of our group in resulted due to numerous factors that were considered when forming a group and working in it. When the circumstances shaped so that we had to form a group we didn't have time to develop lots of the phenomenon that unfortunately exist in many other groups, like groupthink and deindividuation…
Thus, a group can be thought of any arrangement that offers the advantage of greater knowledge. A group accumulates more knowledge, information. While it might seem obvious that any group's intelligence exceeds that of one member, in practice that is not so always the case; especially with regard to the decision making.
In simple terms group decision making can be defined as a collaborative effort in which several members of the group analyze the problem together, consider possible solutions to address the problem and select the best solution from the available alternatives (Barnett, 2011).
The author explains that the decision-making process purchasing process progresses in five stages: recognizing needs, searching for information, evaluating alternatives, purchasing decision and post-purchasing behavior. Need Recognition is the start of the buying process, where the customers realize their need or problem.
Decision making is a complex process that involves giving consideration to numerous factors and perspectives. If decision making as an individual action is difficult enough, it is all the more complicated when performed by a group. In our group, the four members Aleksandar Burneski (110064964), Rocco Guiducci (110065658), Kuir Alaak (100044490) and I Mossab Aljamdi (110079132) have different personality types and character traits.
However, this systematic process of decision making involves complex web of activities and processes which one must need to undertake in order to make effective decision making.
The effectiveness of an organization’s
The study of group behavior has evolved from various disciplines originating among social scientists to organizational management. Contemporary studies of group behavior recognized the need to understand the relationships between group members and
Decision making is presumed to be a logical, linear process, whether the decision is an organisational one or a personal one:
Individuals are not, however, rational and decision making processes are rarely linear, even if there is only one person involved in making
ile it might seem obvious that any groups intelligence exceeds that of one member, in practice that is not so always the case; especially with regard to the decision making. For example, at one time or another one might probably exclaim, "One cant accomplish anything in a
s been done, I find the reasoning for it so that my decision-making does not get affected by entirely alternate evidences which might be available at one point in time in the future. I want to be 100 percent sure that my decision-making process is absolute and comprehensive from
The report would encompass the potential advantages of the group decision and its relevance to the car parts manufacturing company, and then it would even highlight the way of optimising the approach so that the company can maximise the benefits and finally it would be concluded with a brief recommendation for the company.
12 pages (3000 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com