You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Though both of the options are in operational in this particular situation, a judicious decision would be to opt for the second. It is because there have been already similar situations wherein the agency had to suffer. In this situation, a silence to the issue would only damage the reputation of the agency considering the fact that there is greater the reporter, who is a strong crusader in the local war against crime, can damage the reputation of the agency if the situation is not well managed.
There are various vital points that Joan needs to establish in order to justify her decision to follow the recommendation made by one of her officers that the 16-year-old mentally retarded boy should be provided with a community based treatment. She has to prove all her arguments valid to the reporter and therefore the following points may be put across in justification of the decision.
May go about finding fault with the decision taken and rearrange the entire policy in a way that an experienced and more efficient officer is given the responsibility of the entire activity regarding the matter wherein he plays a key role.
Although all these are possibilities, the chief probation officer should take the most innovative and judicious steps to see the plans of Joan are carried forward and realized as such an action alone could help the specific case to be resolved. Therefore, he needs to act with extra maturity and consciousness.
The recommendation made by the probation officer in relation to the specific case of the 16-year-old child may be criticized on various levels. However, when the facts about the specific case are considered, these criticisms prove to be without any room. ...
Not exactly what you need?