Fannie Mae is a company in the US that is involved in the business of mortgage and loans. It has been operating since 1938, and is the second largest firm in the respective industry following Citigroup Inc in the US. It is also considered as the ninth largest firm in the respective industry on the global scale…
In 2004, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) found out that the firm Fannie Mae was violating the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This practice, as per the government investigation took place from 1998-2004, while in the year 1998, the management over stated revenues and understated the expenses. In accordance with a report that has been recently presented by OFHEO, there was involvement of high level executives that led to the misinterpretation and violation of accounting standards, which was a massive scale 'organized-accounting-robbery' mounting the dollar amount to 11 billion. The director of OFHEO took an immediate note and directed correction, which was turned down by Fannie Mae making an excuse that it could have been an end-user issue as the company is not fully automated.
What truly went improper was the fact that loans and mortgage are fairly risky games and there are always chances of customers defaulting, alongside the interest rate risk makes the venture further riskier. For securing their investment and giving better return to stakeholders, Fannie Mae undertook risky ventures and investment for better returns and compensating the main stream line of business. When there were phenomenal profits, the shareholders and executives remain satisfied due to income (dividend yield and capital gains) and bonuses respectively.
Violation of GAAP
In the recently presented report by OFHEO, after three years of extensive investigations, there was a major accounting flaws in the accounting practices of Fannie Mae noticed and marked. The major ones are highlighted as the violation of the following GAAP standards:
1. SFAS-91: Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases
2. SFAS-133: Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As mentioned previously, that there was too much over-estimation of income and underestimated expenses that mainly contributed to increased bottom-line of the financial statements. The excess income was mainly recorded by means of non-refundable fees. Alongside, the future in-flows of cash were adjusted by using hedging and futures counters that introduced lesser risk with fluctuating interest rates, however, these also increased the risk by means of gambling over the same counters with excess money.
Official Involvement & Auditors
The major player/official involved in this scandal was the Chief Executive of Fannie Mae i.e. Franklin Raines. He always defended the company in good terms by making others responsible by tarnishing the repute of the company. The CFO (Chief Financial Officer) also defended the company in good terms by stating that the financial statements were as per the GAAP requirements. The audit of this firm was KPMG who backed out after sometime. The denial of having the firm involved in such a violation gave a view of KPMG being involved them in the issue but it could have been a case of negligence as well as the auditors drew their hands from this case soon. OFHEO ...
Cite this document
(“Fannie Mae Accounting Scandal Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/291155-fannie-mae-accounting-scandal
(Fannie Mae Accounting Scandal Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Fannie Mae Accounting Scandal Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/291155-fannie-mae-accounting-scandal.
Thirdly the above condition ran from 1990 to 2008 after which the case of subprime crisis hit the investors resulting in the doldrums. Fourthly, Bernie Madoff in the light of gaining investments from institutional investors in times of recession reflected to them a picture that their returns would be met.
Siemens AG is the largest multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate that is based in the Germany. The company has fundamental activities in the field of energy, industry, transportation and health care. In essence, it offers a wide variety of electrical engineering and electronic –related products and services.
The investigation done about the case discovered that Siemens AG had made payment of €420 million over a period of seven years to an external consultant. This issue provoked a probe to different company executives, and police took some employees into custody so that they could give information about the scandals that had taken place since 1999.
Furthermore, Thompson and Charlotte (127), explains that bribery involves offering, receiving and soliciting any item, which has value to the parties involved. Nonetheless, this action is tantamount to crime; in fact, various developed countries has increasingly perceiving this issue to be highly controversial.
Refco or Ray E Friedman and Co was a New York based financial services firm that was one of the world's largest and most powerful commodities dealers, specializing in derivative brokerage services (Teather 2005). Prior to the scandal that broke out in 2005, the company employed 2400 people in 14 countries and was the biggest trader on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
This work investigates the Enron scandal itself as well as its consequences. As a result of the investigations and after a long trial, Enron’s former chief executive, Jeffrey Skilling was sentenced to 24 years in jail. Also, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was issued. On a wide scale the effects of applying the Act were beneficial to everyone.
The Enron scandal made it known that corporate fraud and corruption had gained ground in the business setting (Collins, 2006). Addressing Enron’s situation can take a number of alternatives, all of which
unting with the tools to measure and report key financial and non-financial information relating to the acquisition and consumption of financial resources within the corporation. Cost accounting systems provides internal managers with the means and necessary information to