The recreational use of drugs is not a value worth passing on to young people. Such behavior is anti-social and ultimately self-abuse. At the same time it is recognized that there is a certain amount of illogicality in the way that the abuse of legal drugs - such as alcohol - is acceptable vis--vis other narcotics. That is the delinquent is not punished for abusing the drug, but for the actions committed whilst under its influence. Since the most controversial drug at the moment is marijuana this paper will limit itself to the examination of this narcotic.
The Legalise Cannabis Alliance is a UK based political organization committed to the legalization of marijuana. It seeks to have marijuana and marijuana products removed from the UK Misuse of Drugs Act and that possession, cultivation and use of marijuana or its products should be free from prosecution. It argues that marijuana can be used to produce cost-free fuel through the process of pyrolysis on marijuana biomass. Further, it believes that the prohibition of marijuana infringes Human rights."Prohibitiongoes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control man's appetite through legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not even crimes. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our Government was founded." (cited in Legalise Cannabis Alliance manifesto.)...
Why then is it outlawed
There are people who believe that the 'war on drugs' itself is adding to the human and financial costs, and that it would be wiser to stop fighting the war altogether. For example, Legalise Drugs - a pro-legalization, anti-drug organization - point out that the net result of criminalizing drug use is that young people are forced to get their next fix from drug dealers. As its website states, the last time criminals fought over territory with machine guns was during prohibition. It argues that a more sane policy would be to allow people to purchase drugs legally and impose quality standards. Profits made from the sale of drugs could go toward rehabilitation, health care and education services. This view was echoed in the National Academy of Science Report, 1982, (USA):
"The advantages of a policy of regulation include the savings in economics and social costs of law enforcement better controls over the quality and safety of the product, and, possibly, increased credibility of warnings about risk." (cited in the Legalise Cannabis Alliance manifesto.)
The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report (1897) took the position that taxation rather than prohibition was the way forward as this was the best way to restrict the consumption of drugs. The Canadian LeDain Commission Report, 1970 argued as follows::
"Since cannabis is clearly not a narcotic we recommend that the control of cannabis be removed from the Narcotic Control Board The Commission is of the opinion that no one should be liable to imprisonment for simple possession."( cited in Legalise Cannabis Alliance manifesto.)
Judge Francis Young, DEA went further in 1988 arguing that the only reason to ban a drug is because of the possibility of death