This paper will discuss ways in which the United States may deploy its economic and political power to define a new role in a new world. Consideration must now be given to the uses of military power to achieve its strategic objectives its large purposes. Great powers throughout history have successfully maintained their status over time only when they possessed the genius to imagine, and the will to pursue, a systematic plan to dedicate the means they possessed to the achievement of large national purposes…
To respond to the first two revolutions requires foreign policy initiatives in the Middle East and elsewhere as bold as the Marshall Plan and as encompassing as energy security. (Tucker, 2006) To create a national security strategy requires an understanding of the changing nature of conflict particularly, and that requires an understanding of the erosion of the sovereignty of nation-states.
For 350 years, wars have been fought between the uniformed armies of nations with fixed borders, meeting in the field to achieve a political result. Rules evolved for these wars: Geneva conventions and a body of international law spell out the norms for humane treatment and repatriation of prisoners, the rights of noncombatants, rules against the use of torture, and so forth. Nations disintegrate; and when a nation disintegrates, as in the former Yugoslavia, geographic borders warp and sometimes evaporate. (Clancey, 2006) Indeed, part of the process of creating peace among ethnic combatants in a disintegrating nation involves drawing new boundaries and building new nations. And now, in the new age of terrorism, United States experience violence being perpetrated by combatants in civilian clothes, representing no nation, attacking civilian targets, with no political agenda, and possessing only a fanatical commitment to destruction for its own sake.
When the nature of conflict changes, the means of assuring security must also change. New forms of violence resemble war, but by historic standards they are not. What is this new conflict, and how should United States deal with it United States call much of this new kind of violence terrorism. But labeling every bad actor a terrorist tempts us to embrace wretched allies on the always-dubious theory that the enemy of our enemy is our friend. On this same theory, United States supported undemocratic and repressive authoritarian oligarchies during the Cold War simply because they were opposed to communism. (Howard, 2006) United States set about assassinating foreign leaders United States did not like. The bills United States accrue from despicable allies and unprincipled policies that undermine the very principles United States claim to defend, however, always come due.
In the past ten years, United States have seen a dozen or more low intensity conflicts between tribes, clans, and gangs. United States participated in some, including in Somalia, where United States experienced the painful consequences of brawling, however well intentioned, in another man's alley as memorialized in the fi lm Black Hawk Down. United States passively observed similar bloody confl icts, in Rwanda and elsewhere, where the weapon of choice, a machete, dated to the Bronze Age. (Korb, 2006) United States successfully formed a "coalition of the willing," essentially an ad hoc international posse, in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Kuwait. United States earned a quick victory in Kuwait largely due to intensive bombing and maneuver ...
Cite this document
(“Fortifying U.S. National security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/291669-fortifying-us-national-security
(Fortifying U.S. National Security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 Words)
“Fortifying U.S. National Security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/291669-fortifying-us-national-security.
This article explores the model through which population, technology and growth can be fitted to come up with a functional and economic legacy. With three regimes that have lived to characterize the economic development, it is essential that these steps be fairly understood. In a situation where the progress in technology is slow with a growing population, there is a likelihood of reduced rise in output growth.
Both documents together adequately articulate the ‘ways’ and ‘means to implement the administration’s view with regards to the national security as defined in the 2010 National Security Strategy (NSS). Threats to American security and interests have become more defuse, harder to anticipate and more difficult to combat.
The national security branch improves the Bureaus competence as an intelligence agency. The NSB under the leadership of the senior bureau official combines the missions, and resources of the counterintelligence, counterterrorism, weapons of mass destructions and intelligence elements to execute its national security functions.
According to the report the past of terrorist organizations recommends that they do not choose terrorism for its political usefulness. Individual terrorists have a propensity to be motivated more by a wish for social harmony with other members of their association than by political platforms or planned objectives, which are often shadowy and approximate.
While the Cold War posed the primary threat to international order in the latter half of the last century, failed states have emerged as perhaps the greatest threat to international stability. There are currently some forty-six states that are effectively failed or are failing.
istory have successfully maintained their status over time only when they possessed the genius to imagine, and the will to pursue, a systematic plan to dedicate the means they possessed to the achievement of large national purposes. Lacking a grand strategy, the United States is
owever Schonberg2 (2002) argues that in recent years, it has assumed a dominant role in the diplomatic process, becoming the ultimate decision maker where matters such as treaties are concerned. Feaver and Kohn (2000) note that a real gap has developed in civil-military
Political analysts were amazed by how one country was able to harness power and influence all other nations in the world. However, the situation is likely to change with the rapid growth of china in all spheres, politically, economically and in terms
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Fortifying U.S. National security for FREE!