Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

CONTRACT LAW ASSIGNMENT 5 - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : watsicablaze

Summary

There is definitely a contract between John and Jane trading as Square Deal Electrics and their customer Mary. "1. - (1) In Section 14 of the [1979c. 54] Sale of Goods Act 1979 (implied terms about quality or fitness) for subsection (2) there is substituted: (2)Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality…

Extract of sample
CONTRACT LAW ASSIGNMENT 5

Goods should be of satisfactory quality, fit for the purpose, and should be as description. Goods sold must be 'conform to contract' fit for the quality and satisfactory for the intended use of customer. They should be durable, safe, devoid of minor defects. (Sale of Goods act, 1979, Supply of Goods Act, 1982, The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations, 2002).
Under Consumer Protection Act 1987, or under common law, despite there being no contractual relationship between Mary and manufacturer she would be able to pursue the manufacturer for negligence while manufacturing and endangering her life. Also she could pursue the retailer, or breach of contract under SGA.
All the guarantees are legally binding and will stand in a Court of Law. But the clause that any further injury or damage caused by their faulty goods would not be entertained by them will not stand in a court of law. They might have written that for their own protection; it need not necessarily be a legal verdict. In this case the alarm has caused extensive damage within a day and Mary can prove that she was not at fault and did not misuse the alarm in any way. Hence, the protection clause the retailer will not protect him because it will be read as unfair contract terms and thus, will have no legal standing.
Misrepresen ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Principles of European Contract Law
The Unidroit Principles have been regularly applied as lex mercatoria in international commercial arbitration, as they 'meet all the substantive requirements of a true law merchant. On the contrary, arbitrators are being reluctant to apply PECL as generally accepted principles of commercial law in international arbitration. This may be due to their relative novelty, to the fact that their scope is limited to the European Union, or to the strong materialism and esprit collectif which manifests itself by the preminent role of the good faith principle and by a social regulation of the contract…
22 pages (5522 words)
CONTRACT LAW ASSIGNMENT 3
It also depends upon the liability of the company. Here the company seems to have committed gross negligence resulting in grievous injuries on the customer and also damaged the car to the tune of 1500.…
4 pages (1004 words)
Contract Law. Introduction
This is because consideration is a "tit for tat" or quid pro quo situation an agreement cannot be enforced in 'something for nothing' situation. It is the reason for the promise.…
8 pages (2008 words)
Law of Contract, Assignment
This does not mean that there must be an exact subjective matching of the internal thoughts of the two parties. What the law looks for is outward evidence of what the parties agreed or what has been termed the 'external indicia of agreement'.1 This means that even if the parties did not have the same agreement in mind, if their actions, from an objective standpoint could be said to demonstrate an agreement, then a contract has been formed.2 This follows the sensible approach that 'commercial contracts cannot be arranged by what people think in their inmost minds. Commercial contracts are made…
9 pages (2259 words)
CONTRACT LAW ASSIGNMENT 4
Contract terms of employment could change due to changed economic circumstances, or to bring about improvements in working conditions3. Materially changed circumstances are always admissible especially for the benefit of children.…
3 pages (753 words)
Law and Contract Strategy
However, for a valid contract to be valid, the elements must be: a) capacity, b) mutual assent (which includes offer, acceptance, and meeting of minds), c) consideration, d) lawful purpose, e) certainty of terms, and f) form provided by law (Essential 2006). On the other hand, Wikipedia (2007) cited the three key elements of a contract under common law jurisdictions as: a) offer and acceptance, b) consideration, and c) intent to create a legal relation. In sum, while the law considers three essential elements (consent, consideration and object), a valid contract requires other elements (e.g.…
10 pages (2510 words)