In the late 1980's in the United Kingdom, as in many other counties, a mood of general disquiet arose, as result of the actions of a number of bodies, in both the public and private sectors. In the public sector there appeared to be a growing trend for officials and elected representatives to pay little regard to either the consequences of their actions, or the public's reactions to them…
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Critically review the evidence that the corporate governance structures and reporting requirements required in the UK by the Cadbury Committee and its successor"
with a personal 20% discount.
In response to this public pressure, in 1991 the then Conservative government under Prime Minister John Major established the Cadbury Committee and its successors. The remit of these bodies was to establish guidelines under which companies and public bodies should operate. These guidelines were not to be enshrined in law (especially for companies), but rather to be promulgated as "best practice" under which industries would regulate themselves.
Perhaps the most telling case was that of the Mirror Group Newspapers pension fund. Over a period of time the company's pension fund had been plundered of some 400,000,000. The money was used for a variety of purposes, including the enhancement of the MGN's share value, and the personal use of the Chairman, Robert Maxwell.
Of great concern also were the performances of directors of newly privatized utilities. In many cases those same individuals who had been at the helm of state owned bodies now came to have their salaries massively increased, (in some cases three or four-fold) simply because, in the eyes of the public, their enterprise was now privately rather than publicly owned.
As a result of these and other in...
The committee and its successors produced guidance and codes of practice, aimed at reducing or eliminating such malpractice. The Cadbury Code is the unofficial name for the first Code of Best Practice on corporate governance, published in 1992. The other codes were produced by the Greenbury and Hampel Committees, and together they form what is known as the Combined Code on Good Governance.
The codes lay down rules which the London Stock Exchange requires companies to follow, relating to the conduct of directors, directors' remuneration, relations with shareholders, and accountability and audit. They also recommend that boards of U.K. corporations include at least three outside directors and that the positions of chairman and CEO be held by different individuals. The underlying presumption was that these recommendations would lead to improved board oversight.
Essentially, they are designed to make sure that companies are run in an honest and competent way, and to ensure that shareholders are given reliable and adequate information.
In the years since the publication of their reports and recommendations there have been a number of studies published to establish the efficacy of the work of these committees. Most notably in the Journal of management and Governance in 2000, Charlie Weir and David Lang published "The performance-governance relationship: the effects of Cadbury compliance on UK quoted companies" and also in 2000 Jay Dalaya, John J McConnell and Nickolaos G Travlos published "The Cadbury Committee, corporate performance and top management turnover"
While there is no longer the degree of public outrage at the performance at the activities of UK ...
Cite this document
(“Critically review the evidence that the corporate governance Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/293053-critically-review-the-evidence-that-the-corporate-governance-structures-and-reporting-requirements-required-in-the-uk-by-the-cadbury-committee-and-its-successor
(Critically Review the Evidence That the Corporate Governance Essay)
“Critically Review the Evidence That the Corporate Governance Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/293053-critically-review-the-evidence-that-the-corporate-governance-structures-and-reporting-requirements-required-in-the-uk-by-the-cadbury-committee-and-its-successor.
In the report, the researcher has discussed about the development of the UK corporate governance code from 1992 to present. For ensuring a good corporate governance structure in the companies, the government has set many committees for suggesting the changes those are required in the companies. The committees suggested changes in the various areas of the company.
There has been a gradual evolution of business dynamics from government and state sponsored businesses and industries to individual powerhouses dominating the field till the later part of the 20th century. However, the business system that has been dominant for the last 40 years or so has been that of the shareholder – centric approach.
There is a hierarchical difference in various corporate that exist even in the same country. Therefore, it is prudent to justify that corporate structure differ from one organization or country to another. However, structures and organizations in various corporate is the way in which different structures are formed is to achieve a common goal, that is, managerial accountability1.
The recent revisions made in the Law were required to ensure a greater application of the law, both in the letter and in the spirit, and a greater ease of flow of information between the shareholders and the board.
Sir Adrian Cadbury highlighted the principle of corporate governance as the equilibrium between economic and social goals; between individual and communal objectives (Mallin 2011, p.3). The UK corporate system can be regarded as a three-party system (comprising of directors, shareholders, and the auditors) that is principle based rather than rule based.
and transparency in the firms relationship with its all stakeholders (financiers, customers, management, employees, government, and the community)” (BusinessDictionary.com, 2009). The development of this area has been affected by many theories such as agency theory,
a result of flawed practices as many examples of poor governance such as Enron, Arthur Anderson, WorldCom and Tyco along with many others have surfaced. The actions of these corporate giants and the scandals which surrounded them gave rise to a great degree of mistrust for the
In complex organisations with variety of interested parties and many potential conflicts of interest, corporate governance can inform these parties about the organisation’s activities and also protects stakeholder’s rights through
Corporate governance can be understood through various frameworks of the firm. Agency theory is one of those frameworks, and entails the separation of ownership and control of an organisation. In this case,
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically review the evidence that the corporate governance structures and reporting requirements required in the UK by the Cadbury Committee and its successor for FREE!