Since the beginning of the 20th century, "the war on drugs" has been one of the main programs developed and introduced by the US government in order to prevent and reduce illegal drug trade and trafficking. …
On the one hand, the "war on drugs" helps criminal justice system to control illegal drug trade and reduce a number of drug addicts. The creation of the threat estimate is a logical and orderly examination of all the factors which when combined give shape to the threat. The circularity of effects should be dear. As American communities changed, fear of the unfamiliar and unknown, and consequently that of crime, rose. As a result, when people encounter illegal acts they are more likely to call the police, out of fear, whereas in the past, when the situation did not contain the element of unfamiliarity, the issue would be handled informally. So increasing fear is a cause of acceleration in reported crime when the actual incidence of crime has remained stable. In contrast to this view, "many critics claim that current drug control strategy is not only unnecessarily punitive but also largely ineffective". The majority of survey respondents str not satisfied with the present situation, characterizing information/intelligence exchange as being "hit or miss," with actual "intelligence business" being conducted by personal contact and investigator meetings-in short, on a case by case basis. They cited limited connectivity between existing and planned networks and limited integration of federal efforts with those of state and local. Some investigators query systems but are reluctant to provide information to input. Fears of 'claim jumping' lucrative cases have prompted previously cooperative agencies to act much more cautiously." Additionally, "guarding drug intelligence and concealing major. “The current "prosecute-or-extradite" system functions through national prosecutions aided by ad hoc international cooperation. It leaves the enforcement of narcotics laws to individual nation-states, as nations may choose to assert jurisdiction and prosecute drug traffickers within their national justice systems, to extradite them to a requesting state, or to avoid taking any action" (Mcconville 2000, p. 75).
In addition, "the war on drugs" becomes a real burden for criminal justice system and prisons. Crowding in penal institutions may produce the most volatile situation of all. Many prisoners do not have a chance to be put on parole, so the effects of crowding apply steady pressure on them. That pressure is exacerbated by the violence, racism, and sense of hopelessness found in prisons. Crowding affects prison life in two ways: control of the prison population is more difficult as individual disciplinary problems and major disturbances increase, and individual deterioration is fostered (Miller, 2004). Prisoners living in crowded facilities for sustained periods commit suicide, die, are murdered, create disturbances, become ill, and have interpersonal problems more often than inmates not living in crowded surroundings. Both the actual amount of living space available to each inmate and the total number of men or women incarcerated are related to the negative impacts of imprisonment. Large institutions produce more severe physical and psychological effects than smaller facilities (The War on Drugs ...
Cite this document
(“War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/293385-war-on-drugs
(War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1)
“War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/293385-war-on-drugs.
First body paragraph highlights controversial debate over the use of drugs by the government at the same time when government fights against it. Second body paragraph includes a brief view of the policies and laws proposed and implement by the government of the USA in the war against drugs. Third paragraph discusses claims and arguments of the individuals who are against illegalization of drugs. Conclusion includes an outcome of the argumentative discussion over legal and illegal use of alcohol and other drugs by the government of the US.
It analyzes how many professionals believe that incarcerating drug offenders actually reduces crime, but what they do not know is the fact that according to the time series analysis of four crime rates in the United States, this view is not supported.
The war on drugs has implied harsh punishment on persons found either using or selling drugs, ignoring the level at which it is practiced, as is the case with high-school children looking to earn some extra money to support their families. Furthermore, persons incarcerated for minor drug trafficking find it difficult to get employment having being convicted. This leads them to refining the skills they already have in drug trade (Becker and Murphy, 2013). Established in the 1970s by President Nixon, the war on drugs has resulted in devoting of substantial government resources to law enforcement and criminal justice processes.
One might posit that the reason for such a differential has to do with the overall level of harm differential that exists between these drugs; however, when one considers the fact that alcohol is more addictive and destructive than any illegal street drug with the exception of heroin and cocaine, the level of differential between these, from a quality of health standpoint, is negligible.
The researcher of this essay demonstrates today's realities in drug control policies of the US. Policies, that are described in this essay will enable the government to effectively and efficiently deal with the issue. The essay also explores drugs topic through television and books and mentiones that US government still are publicly criticized for not doing enough to stop drug dealing.
tern countries have been facing more complexities because of drug addiction among youth and weak initiatives by governments in countries such as the United States in the context of drug legalization and addiction. In this paper, we shall argue about the measures taken by the
“UN treaty that was enacted on 1961 limited the access of dangerous narcotic drugs” (Malinowska-Sempruch, Hoover and Alexandrova, 2003:196), which undermine the wellbeing of the society. Therefore, they employ various drug policies, which are
Drugs are shown to affect people of all ages, particularly young people in their productive years leading to grave health problems. So, as drugs affect citizens’ physical health, moral behavior, and so on and thereby lead to a number of social problems, the government have been coming up with measures to control this drug menace.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic War on Drugs for FREE!