Neonatal male circumcision is a prophylactic surgical operation which offers medical benefits supported by evidence based studies particularly in protecting against urinary tract infection (infantile), human immunodeficiency syndrome, sexually transmitted disease and penile cancer.
According to Schoen et al (2000), evidence indicates that in the first year of life uncircumcised infants have at least a 10-fold increased risk of UTI; a circumcised infant has approximately a 1 in 1000 chance of having UTI in the first year of life, whereas an uncircumcised infant has a 1 in 100 chance.
The Soweto study, conducted in South Africa, found that circumcision reduced the risk of men contracting AIDS during heterosexual intercourse by about 65 percent. Circumcision prevented six to seven out of 10 potential HIV infection stated by Astor (2005).
Studies suggest that circumcised males may be less at risk for syphilis than are uncircumcised males. Genital ulcers related to STD may increase susceptibility. A probable biologic rationalization for this association in that the mucous surface of the uncircumcised penis allows for viral attachment to lymphoid cells at or near the surface of the mucous membrane, as well as more likely minor abrasions resulting in increased access to target tissues.
Schoen et al (2000) stated a successive study indicating only a 3-fold greater risk of penile cancer in uncircumcised men unreasonably combined lethal invasive penile cancer with carcinoma in situ (CIS). 213 cases (122 CIS, 91 invasive cancers) in a large health maintenance organization reported relative risk of CIS developing in uncircumcised men was 3-fold. Another study by Maden et al uncircumcised men had 22 times the risk of having invasive cancer compared with circumcised men.
A. Circumcision reduces sexual pleasure.
During sex, the extra length of extremely sensitive skin provided by the foreskin allows the erect penis shaft to slide gracefully back and forth within the penile skin, providing an additional layer of friction and protection during the sexual act and providing an additional level of pleasure, when compared to the rigid and inflexible nature of most circumcised penises (http://www.coolnurse.com/circumcision_probs2.htm, 2005).
B. Circumcision is a painful procedure.
Circumcision is extremely painful and traumatic for an infant. According to anti-circumcision, it is a form of child abuse, and that the perpetrators of this form of child abuse are really offensive criminals who have caused conflicting damage to their own children (http://www.universalway.org/circtruth.html, 2004).
A. Circumcision does not reduce sexual pleasure.
Schoen et al (2000) stated anecdotal beliefs about foreskin protective benefit on the tip of the penis and the belief that circumcision causes decreased sexual pleasure. Neither of these anecdotal beliefs meets the stated criterion of being evidence-based. On the contrary, in the case of sexual pleasure, surveys indicate that women prefer sex with circumcised men, primarily from the standpoint of cleanliness and appearance, and the AAP Task Force (1999) cites evidence that circumcised adult men have more varied sexual practice and less sexual dysfunction.
B. Pain is effectively controlled by ...
Cite this document
(“Infant Circumcision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/294114-infant-circumcision
(Infant Circumcision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Infant Circumcision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/294114-infant-circumcision.
Female genital mutilation continues eliciting ethical, legal and professional concerns in medical practice mainly because of its widespread application for non-therapeutic use cultural use in various parts of the world. This paper examines how ethical, legal and professional issues underpin female circumcision in clinical practice.
There is no argument that laws should be aimed at protecting the society but there are certain practices which are termed as religious or cultural. These practices sometimes are sometimes in violation with the universal definition of human rights but people argue in favor of them because of the religious and cultural basis of those practices.
It is sole responsibility of every individual in the various communities and societies in general to identify, recognize and uphold particular civil liberties. Every individual needs to know the scopes of civil liberties applicable at every stage of human life.
It borne in mind; infant mortality refers to the number of infants who die at their first year of life per one thousand live births in a certain population. Over years, studies outline that, infant mortality has been a major concern since, the number of infants mortality rate for blacks seem high compared to whites (Garrett 33).
It is usually to be done within 48 hours of the baby’s birth or at the most within 10 days of birth. Until the 1970s, circumcision was considered to be a religious custom and parents’ permission was not mandatory for circumcising male infants. David Gollaher argues that circumcision doesn’t make a boy a Jewish or a Muslim.
So attempts to save the women from the practice may in fact reflect a longer-lived prejudice against all things 'African'.
Njambi suggests that the current campaign against "female genital mutilation" (or FGM) in fact suggests that the human body can be separated from its cultural context, and that those who are so against the practice are perpetuating a "culture/nature dualism" that has been "roundly questioned by feminists in science studies".
It was determined that in 1980s 60% of newborn boys in the United States went through circumcision and today this rate is a bit lower – 56%. Many boys in the United States and Canada still undergo circumcision
I was unable to ferret out the details of his immediate family members since the teacher did not give me the details but all I could tell is that given the child belong to an African American family, it appeared that the family was not
The study explores the extent to which states define and recognize the fundamental right of freedom of religion, how the federal and the state governments treat various aspects of freedom of religion. In addition, it also investigates the roles that the US government needs to play in ensuring maximum protection of the freedom of religion.