The general rule for nationals of Member States is that they have free movement within the Community: Article 39. Article 39(3) sets out the rights attaching to freedom of movement of workers in the EU stating that they are subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health…
It applies to restrictions on movement and residence; not access to or conditions of employment. Article 55 makes the provisions of Article 46 applicable also to the free movement of services. The public policy, security and health derogations are given a narrow scope and are determined by the ECJ and secondary legislation. Directive 64/2212 provides for the issuing of directives to coordinate these measures. The directive applies to the employed, self-employed and their families, recipients of services, retired persons and students, but not to companies. All the main provisions are directly effective.
The derogations are concerned with the specific characteristics of particular persons. The limit to the exercise and scope of the derogations are set by community law with regard to non-discrimination, proportionality, protection for fundamental rights and the various safeguards in Directive 64/221.3
Directive 64/221 seeks to coordinate all measures relating to entry and deportation from member state territories including the issue and/or renewal of residence permits which can be adopted on grounds of public policy, security and health.
Member States are free to determine the scope of these concepts on the basis of their national legislation and case law, but within the framework of Community law. Specifically member states cannot plead the need to derogate from Directive 64/221 in order to service economic ends4 such as high unemployment. However, any measures taken on grounds of public policy, public security or public health must be justified by a real and sufficiently serious threat to a fundamental interest of society and must be in conformity with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with the proportionality principle.
Article 4 is a standstill clause and covers public health exceptions and refers to illnesses in the Annex to the directive. Diseases fall under 2 headings in the Annex. The first heading covers those diseases which are subject to quarantine and listed by the World Health Organisation and are highly infectious specifically mentioned are active or incipient tuberculosis, syphilis, and other infectious diseases or contagious parasitic diseases if they are the subject of provisions for the protection of nationals of the host country.
The second heading covers diseases and disabilities which threaten public policy or security such as drug addiction; profound mental disturbance; manifest conditions of psychotic disturbance with agitation, delirium, hallucinations or confusion. Article 4(2) provides that diseases or disabilities which occur after the issue of a first residence permit cannot justify refusal to renew a permit or expulsion.
Prima facie the French authorities cannot refuse to renew Enzo's residence permit or to expel him. Although he is a drug addict, his addiction can be shown to have commenced following his arrival in France and the issuing of his first residency permit. He is therefore protected by Article 4(2) which clearly states that the French authorities cannot use his drug addiction to refuse to renew his residence permit or to expel him from their territories in these circumstances.
One wonders whether the French authorities may be able to refuse renewal of his residence permit or to expel him under the public policy ground for drug possession. Firstly it is not ...
Cite this document
(“European Union Law College Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/294157-european-union-law-college-essay
(European Union Law College Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“European Union Law College Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/294157-european-union-law-college-essay.
Moreover, it is an economic and political union of 27 European countries (Oxford Dictionary of English, 2008) and it operates though a fusion of “supranational” independent institutions and intergovernmental decisions negotiated among its members (Anneli, 2005, p.205).
The EU constantly underscores commitment to establishing a cosmopolitan European identity.1 Depending on the source, there are about 12-15 million Muslims living within the member states of the European Union and this number is anticipated to rise to 23 million by the year 2015.
The rationale behind the formation of this association was creation of a strong single European market that would be beneficial for the wholesome economic development of all the member countries, to promote social unity among the people and most importantly, to enhance the prominence of Europe in the global economy (University of Iowa College of Law Center for International Finance and Development, 2013).
Problems arise every now and then when the Council issues directives and regulations that member states take too long implement. Because the Treaty has set strict guidelines on the Council's adoption of a decision, this becomes another area of frequent discourse.
The regulation empowers a member state to refuse an export licence if it considers that the goods sought to be exported outside the community are its national treasures having artistic, historical or archaeological value. This is without prejudice to a member state's right under article 36 of EC treaty (currently article 30) reading as follows.
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott also said that "the ... concept of federalism does not feel quite right as an explanation of the EU which. ... is too sui generis, too complex, too multidimensional to fit into any such categorization".
In the following essay, we will try to discuss and analyze these statements with reference to Treaties, case law of the European Court of Justice and contemporary political and academic opinion, in order to understand how the European Union is organized.
However, this discontentment of the voters towards a Constitution shall not wipe out the progressive efforts that the European Union made to promote equality between human beings throughout the years. In 1993, the twelve members agreed in Copenhagen2 on values that each state should respect: Democracy, State of Rights, Human Rights, and Market Economy.
The main institutions that carry out these tasks are the European Parliament, European Council, European Commission, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Auditors, each of which acts within the limits of the powers conferred upon it by the EC Treaty.
Indeed, in some cases behaviour may display characteristics of both and it may be possible to categorize it as an agreement or, in the alternative, as concerted practices."
For years, television has been more than just an object of entertainment for us. It is not only an upgradeable property, but it has been one of the greatest influences of our lives.