Is Death Penalty Justifiable - Assignment Example

This matter entails unresolved issues on its justification as a rightful punishment for convicted criminals. The death penalty advocates stress mainly that this system will deter crime and moreover give justice or retribution to the crime victims and their families. On the other hand, the death penalty abolitionists believe that the death penalty does not deter crime but rather promotes it. Moreover, it violates the human rights of the convicted criminals, some are maybe wrongfully convicted and there is an apparent issue of unequal treatment or discrimination of would-be convicted criminals because of being poor or a member of a minority group.

One of the main purposes of having the death penalty in the judicial system was to advocate fear of committing a crime and stopping criminals in doing so now that they are immobilized or put out of action. But does the death penalty on convicted criminals honestly discourage others from doing crime I personally don't believe so? An acted violence punished by another form of violence results in a cycle of violence. Fear from the punishment of a crime won't stop criminals from committing crimes.

These proceedings will not only promote its existence as a system but also its normality. Normality leads to acceptance and is a ticket to apathy as supposed to fear. Advocates s Advocates say that the death penalty brings justice or retribution to the victims and their families. I sadly do not agree with this. I do not believe in the basic essence of the word justice in this case. Should there be such a word Death penalty ends the life of someone who took or damaged the victim's life. But does that bring back the supposed life of the victim and their families No, it does not.

This does not mean justice, its retribution and more like vengeance. "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth", isn't it about time to stop this kind of thinking It is barbaric and inhuman. Given that some of these convicted criminals were the author of such horrendous crimes, ending their lives I believe will not bring justice to the bereaved. Life imprisonment without parole is a more likely option with the possibility of reformation on the life of the convicted criminal.Issues on the unfair application of the death penalty appeals to an accused that belongs to a minority race also are abundant and apparent especially in the United States of America.

Procedures on death penalty appeals in the case of the accused or the victim are influenced by his/her race or financial capabilities; that is, inadequate defense of the accused or inadequate support for the conviction of an accused in support of the victim.This also strengthens the notions of death penalty abolitionists that possible death penalty candidates may be convicted wrongly. In a more practical note, anti-death penalty groups say that a session of capital execution or death penalty is expensive and costs more than to imprison the convicted criminals for as long as they live.

On this note, death penalty advocates answer that death penalty costs can be minimized by limiting the appeals for the death penalty. If you come to think of it, this notion will only result in more injustices. Let's just say, what I have just said was a bit indifferent to the pain of the victims and their families who are left to endure more pain. I do not disregard the fact that every victim has a story.