Foreseeability in law

Undergraduate
Coursework
Miscellaneous
Pages 1 (251 words)
Download 0
Does the requirement for a plaintiff in a negligent case to prove foreseeability make sense Shouldn't a defendant be responsible for all the actual consequences of the careless conduct Is it fair that an injured party might be able to recover from no one
The tort of negligence is a breach of a duty of care on the part of the defendant which results in the injury of the plaintiff…

Introduction


There are numerous arguments claiming this requirement is unjust and that the defendant should be held responsible for the actual consequences of any careless conduct that results in injury, whether foreseeable or not. However, this broadens the scope of the tort considerably and would open up an endlessness of liability.
Further, foreseeability ensures fairness for the defendant. Is would be unjust to hold a defendant liable for conduct which they could not have anticipated would result in injury. Being penalized for conduct which does not foreseeably cause injury would result in numerous frivolous claims. Accidents occur all of the time. While it would be fantastic for the injured party to always have recourse for legal action, it would not be fair to those defendants of whom are undeserving.
There are some injuries no one could predict and no one but the forces of fate should be held responsible and certainly no one should be penalized. This may be unfortunate for the injured party, but the blame cannot always be laid at someone else's feet. Foreseeability ensures blame can only be laid at the feet of those who should have reasonably foreseen the consequences of their actions. This is fair. This is just. Taking away the requirement of forseeability would make the opposite true.
...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Businese Law
By this time Karter had not parted with the money to purchase the paintings. Therefore Karter purchases the paintings knowing very well that Jimmy had repudiated his offer and was not going to make any good payment of them. 1…
Business Law in Australia (Tort)
Since such affected people are described as neighbours, the doctrine of duty is usually described as the neighbour principle. For the purpose of this doctrine a person's neighbours are individuals who are directly and proximately affected by act of commission or omission of that person.…
Critically discuss all possible negligence claims that could be brought in the below situations
He was off work for a week as a result of his injuries, causing him lost wages of 1,000. He now wishes to claim compensation for his injury and lost wages.…
Law
Since I am new to the study of law, I searched for introductory legal books. The book entitled "Learning Legal Rules: A Student's Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning" is one that comes highly recommended and is an excellent source of basic information on which I can build a strong foundation for my continued study of law. Additionally, it is the book that I utilize for my seminars.…
Foreseeability in law
There are numerous arguments claiming this requirement is unjust and that the defendant should be held responsible for the actual consequences of any careless conduct that results in injury, whether foreseeable or not. However, this broadens the scope of the tort considerably and would open up an endlessness of liability.…
law of carriage of goods by sea
However this extra equipment was necessary to avoid the build up of potentially explosive gases and to keep the cargo at the agreed temperature, both for purposes of care for the cargo and the safety of the vessel.…
Business Law - land law
By its very nature, a claim of adverse possession is hostile to the claims of other persons. It cannot be hidden but must be open and notorious in order to put other persons on notice as to one's claim for possession of the real estate. A claim to title by adverse possession often must be made under color of title. Color of title means a claim to title by way of a fact which, although on its face…