1. What was Descartes' theory of interactive dualism According to Descartes, what are the essential properties of mind and body Identify strengths and weaknesses of this framework. What were the general implications of interactive dualism for the development of scientific method in psychology
The essential property of a mind is that it thinks; the essential property of body is that it is "extended." Each thought is a modification of mind; each physical object, a modification of matter. Since mind is different from body (otherwise, they would not be two distinct substances), its essential characteristics must be different from those of body. This means that minds cannot take up space or be extended. If they were, they would be forms of body. Body, in contrast to mind, is that which is extended. Every form in which a material object can exist can be defined or described in forms of its extensional features-size, shape, position, movement.
2. Explain how Descartes' method of doubt was supposed to insure certain knowledge. What is the special role of innate ideas in Descartes' theory of knowledge Which ideas did Descartes considered to be innate How are innate ideas different from other types of ideas
Descartes' method of doubt says that he wishes to examine those things which he thinks to be true and set aside all those beliefs of which there might be some doubt. ...
Cite this document
(“Descartes theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/296176-descartes-theory
(Descartes Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Descartes Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/296176-descartes-theory.
This is because of the way that it divides human experience between what happens in the mind as compared to what is experienced by the body. This question has become more complicated in recent years as ‘virtual reality’ became an actual possibility and as new science continues to raise doubts as to whether such a division can occur.
The three theorists and theories included are: Plato’s Divided Line Theory, Descartes Method of Doubt, and Freud’s Psychoanalysis. The similarities and differences are demonstrated, as well as the reasoning that was used in creating each theory. Plato, Descartes, and Freud’s Take on the Posture of Reason Philosophy was birthed out of the innate longing of human nature to understand the interworking of human thought, action, and purpose.
Nevertheless, although the three sources attempt to ask analogous questions, it is essentially their manner of answering these questions that differentiate them from each other. Plato examines the notion that the real world represents an illusion within the allegory of the cave presented in The Republic.
Descartes’ theory of perception is deeply embedded on the premise that perception has nothing to do with hearing, seeing, touching or imagining. In this regard, some people have erroneously been swayed into believing that Descartes, in his conclusions, disqualifies the importance of sense perceptions in understanding ‘truth’ or the true nature of things.
In modern times, Descartes philosophy was well depicted in the film but in a somewhat different perspective. Thus, this paper hence aims to rewrite the above mentioned Descartes’ argument in terms of the film. The Matrix is a movie that is predominantly based on Descartes’ dream argument.
It is one of the most influential works in the history of modern natural sciences. At first, he opted not to publish it during its time when controversies continued to dominate French and European societies, as to its being culturally radical. But what was radical in Descartes' reasoning
For Descartes, the senses were not wholly reliable in ascertaining the truth of anything because he believed they could be deceptive, as was stated. (Monarch Notes 1963). For example, when it came to knowing whether a person was dreaming or not, sense perception could not be used to know for a certainty whether a person was awake or in a dream state.